Sommers Schwartz, P.C.

Michigan Attorneys at Law

  • FREE CONSULTATION
  • 800.783.0989
    248.355.0300 (LOCAL)
  • Email Us
  • Home
  • About
    • Overview
    • Client Testimonials
    • Attorney Referrals
    • Careers
  • Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Birth Injury
    • Personal Injury
    • Class Action
    • Employment
    • Commercial Law & Intellectual Property
  • Accomplishments
    • Representative Cases
    • Verdicts & Settlements
  • Resources
    • In The News
    • Videos
  • Contact
  • Blog
    • Birth Injury
    • Class Action
    • Commercial Law & Intellectual Property
    • Employment
    • Firm News
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Personal Injury

Urban Outfitters Sued for Shortchanging Workers Out of Overtime Pay

October 10, 2017 by Charles Ash, IV

Wage Theft & Unpaid Overtime

Whether an employee qualifies as exempt from the overtime pay requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) doesn’t turn on their job title. Instead it comes down to the employee’s actual duties and responsibilities. In a pending lawsuit, the nationwide retailer Urban Outfitters will find out whether its attempt to classify department managers as exempt will survive scrutiny.

As reported by Bloomberg BNA, a former retail department manager recently sued Urban Outfitters claiming that the company should have paid him overtime because he was often engaged in non-managerial assignments.

CALL US
1.800.783.0989
Free
Consultation

The FLSA requires that all non-exempt employees be paid overtime premiums of one and one half their regular hourly rate for all hours worked more than 40 in any single week. Many of these “white-collar” exemptions require that the employee be paid on a salary of not less than $455 per week, but also involve an analysis of the duties the employee is engaged in to qualify for the exemption. The Urban Outfitters retail managers argue that their job duties were non-exempt and thus required overtime pay.

While the lawsuit was initially filed as a collective action on behalf of all of Urban Outfitters’ retail managers, the class was decertified in September 2017 due to dissimilar situations amongst class members. Since then, retail managers have been filing individual FLSA lawsuits against the company. At least 18 department managers have filed individual lawsuits against Urban Outfitters since the collective action was decertified.

The determination of whether employees are similarly situated for purposes of a FLSA collective action is made on a case by case basis. Most jurisdictions follow a two-step approach to collective action certification in FLSA cases. The first step involves a very lenient standard that often permits for conditional certification in order to provide notice to other class members.  However, the second step is a more detailed and critical inquiry to determine whether the case is truly best handled as a collective action.

Share on LinkedIn Share
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Google Plus Share
Share on Facebook Share
0

Categories: Class Action, Employment

Practice Areas: Employment

About Charles Ash, IV

Charles R. Ash, IV is an associate in Sommers Schwartz’s Complex Litigation groups. A substantial portion of Rob’s practice is devoted to collective and class actions arising under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and similar state laws, and he appears in state and federal courts across the United States to represent employees against their corporate employers. View all posts by Charles Ash IV →

Recent Posts

  • Autonomous Vehicle Accidents: Who’s Liable
  • Landmark Second Circuit Ruling Bans Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation
  • Jury Awards Multimillion-Dollar Verdict to Arab-American Ford Employee in Hostile Workplace Lawsuit

Categories

  • Birth Injury (19)
  • Case Alerts (2)
  • Class Action (320)
  • Commercial Law & Intellectual Property (37)
  • Employment (340)
  • Firm News (33)
  • Medical Malpractice (138)
  • Personal Injury (112)
  • Railroaders (5)
  • Uncategorized (1)

Connect With Us

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Search

Archived By Month

  • April 2018 (8)
  • March 2018 (9)
  • February 2018 (13)
  • January 2018 (5)
  • December 2017 (6)
  • November 2017 (21)
  • October 2017 (19)
  • September 2017 (10)
  • August 2017 (1)
  • July 2017 (10)
  • June 2017 (7)
  • May 2017 (7)
  • April 2017 (9)
  • March 2017 (15)
  • February 2017 (13)
  • January 2017 (11)
  • December 2016 (11)
  • November 2016 (7)
  • October 2016 (8)
  • September 2016 (10)
  • August 2016 (12)
  • July 2016 (8)
  • June 2016 (9)
  • May 2016 (15)
  • April 2016 (18)
  • March 2016 (17)
  • February 2016 (13)
  • January 2016 (15)
  • December 2015 (12)
  • November 2015 (15)
  • October 2015 (17)
  • September 2015 (11)
  • August 2015 (16)
  • July 2015 (17)
  • June 2015 (16)
  • May 2015 (10)
  • April 2015 (5)
  • March 2015 (12)
  • February 2015 (22)
  • January 2015 (13)
  • December 2014 (6)
  • November 2014 (5)
  • October 2014 (15)
  • September 2014 (7)
  • August 2014 (8)
  • July 2014 (10)
  • June 2014 (9)
  • May 2014 (12)
  • April 2014 (5)
  • March 2014 (6)
  • February 2014 (10)
  • January 2014 (11)
  • December 2013 (10)
  • November 2013 (8)
  • October 2013 (13)
  • September 2013 (9)
  • August 2013 (14)
  • July 2013 (8)
  • May 2013 (1)
  • April 2013 (1)
  • March 2013 (1)
  • January 2013 (2)
  • December 2012 (2)
  • November 2012 (2)
  • September 2012 (2)
  • July 2012 (6)
  • June 2012 (1)
  • April 2012 (1)
  • March 2012 (4)
  • February 2012 (3)
  • January 2012 (7)
  • December 2011 (1)
  • November 2011 (1)
  • December 2010 (1)
  • November 2010 (1)
 
1 Towne Square, #1700, Southfield, MI 48076    Directions →    Phone: 248.355.0300
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn


The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation.
This information on this website is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing of this information does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2017 Sommers Schwartz, P.C.. All Rights Reserved. Privacy/Legal | Sitemap