The Camp Lejeune Justice Act of 2022. Are you eligible for compensation?
BY: Lance C. Young | IN: Class Action & Commercial Litigation, Employment Law, Unpaid Wages & Overtime
Automotive supplier Denso Corporation, accused of conspiring to fix the prices of certain auto parts, recently succeeded in dismissing the claims of various plaintiffs involved in the multidistrict litigation.
Among the issues in question in the antitrust cases are Denso’s activities in setting prices for motor generators and inverters installed in electric and hybrid electric vehicles. As reported in Law360 (subscription required), Judge Marianne Battani of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan entered orders dismissing the lawsuits of 48 “end-payor” plaintiffs, finding that the cars purchased by those plaintiffs did not contain either component.
This latest development has no impact on the other claims or parties involved in the litigation, which stems from a U.S. Department of Justice investigation into alleged pricing-fixing practices by Denso and other auto parts manufacturers. In addition to the two Denso components, the consolidated lawsuits involve occupant safety restraints and automotive wire harnesses.
To date, auto suppliers targeted by the investigation have paid in excess of $2 billion in fines:
The collection of lawsuits, formally known as In re: Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation, continues to proceed, and Sommers Schwartz is among the law firms representing the plaintiffs.
View all posts byLance C. Young