Catholic Youth Organization (CYO) programs in Rhode Island gave thousands of children access to sports, after-school activities, weekend events, and community gatherings through the Diocese of Providence. For many families, CYO was a trusted part of parish life. Priests and adult volunteers ran these programs, which placed them in regular, unsupervised contact with children. The Rhode Island Attorney General’s 2026 clergy abuse report confirmed that this access was exploited. If you were abused in a CYO program, you were not at fault, and you now have legal options that did not exist before. A sexual assault attorney at Sommers Schwartz can help you understand what those options mean for your specific situation.
Table of Contents
- What CYO Programs in Rhode Island Actually Were, and Why They Created Risk
- How the Diocese of Providence Enabled Abuse in Youth Programs Like CYO
- Rhode Island’s New Child Sexual Abuse Law and What It Means for CYO Survivors
- Who Can Be Held Legally Responsible for CYO Abuse in Rhode Island
- What Survivors of CYO Abuse in Rhode Island Should Know Before Coming Forward
- FAQs About CYO Sexual Abuse Claims in Rhode Island
What CYO Programs in Rhode Island Actually Were, and Why They Created Risk
The Catholic Youth Organization (CYO) is a parish-based academic and athletic program that falls within the parameters of a parish’s comprehensive youth ministry program. In Rhode Island, CYO operated under the Diocese of Providence, placing priests and parish volunteers directly in charge of children during sports, retreats, camping trips, and other activities held outside of school hours.
Many think about sports programs when they think about CYO. But these parish-based youth programs offer more than just sports. Thousands of children and teens also participate in activities that span from teen groups to fitness challenges, art, essay, oratorical contests and more. In Rhode Island, programs like the Catholic Athletic League, summer camps, and retreat weekends were all part of this broader youth ministry structure run through the Diocese of Providence.
The Rhode Island Attorney General’s 2026 investigation into the Diocese of Providence found that CYO programs were among the settings where abuse occurred. The report identified that priests used their authority and access to youth programs to isolate children. According to the report, accused clergy frequently sought out assignments or volunteer opportunities involving children, demonstrated excessive involvement in children’s lives, and allowed minors to congregate in and around parish rectories. CYO provided exactly that kind of access.
The report also found that abuse occurred during camping trips and overnight activities, settings that mirror the structure of CYO-sponsored events. One documented case involved a priest who abused a child during a camping trip to New Hampshire, where shared sleeping arrangements gave the priest direct, private access. These were not random failures. They were predictable outcomes of a system that placed trusted authority figures in close, unsupervised contact with children, without adequate oversight.
If you participated in CYO sports, retreats, or other Diocese-sponsored youth programs and experienced abuse, that abuse was enabled by a structure that failed to protect you. What happened was not your fault.
How the Diocese of Providence Enabled Abuse in Youth Programs Like CYO
The Rhode Island Attorney General’s March 2026 report on child sexual abuse in the Diocese of Providence documented a pattern of institutional failure that extended directly into youth programs. The report accused the Catholic Diocese of Providence of a “well-worn pattern” of failing to remove dozens of priests accused of child sexual abuse and keeping the abuse secret over decades. The report identified 75 clergy members who sexually abused more than 300 children since 1950. The investigation found that accused priests were repeatedly returned to ministry.
The Attorney General’s report found that the Diocese did not adequately respond to concerns about grooming behavior by clergy, even within recent years. Grooming, which refers to the process abusers use to build trust with children and their families before committing abuse, was a documented feature of how priests operated inside CYO and similar programs. The report noted that priests would hire children to perform tasks, host groups of minors in rectories, and seek prolonged one-on-one time with specific children.
The Diocese’s own child protection policies contained significant gaps. The report found inadequate supervision of credibly accused clergy, insufficient documentation of abuse investigations, and a failure to consistently use trauma-informed methods when evaluating survivor reports. The Diocese also delegated youth safety training to local parishes without verifying that training was actually delivered.
The report also confirmed that accused clergy served in CYO and other church-sponsored youth programs. Father Adrien Menard, for example, reportedly hosted groups of boys at a cottage on Lake Pascoag in Burrillville and later molested a survivor on a family trip to California. These were not isolated incidents. They reflect a broader institutional failure to protect children in programs the Diocese controlled and supervised.
Rhode Island’s New Child Sexual Abuse Law and What It Means for CYO Survivors
Governor Dan McKee signed legislation amending the statute of limitations for child victim claims of sexual abuse and creating a two-year window for victims to bring otherwise time-barred claims against institutions and supervisors accused of enabling or covering up sexual abuse. This law, known as H-7200a/S-2616a, was signed on June 11, 2026, and took effect on July 1, 2026.
The new law establishes a two-year civil “revival window” that opens from July 1, 2026, to June 30, 2028. During this 24-month period, survivors can file civil suits even if the statute of limitations on their claims had previously expired. This is a critical change for CYO survivors, many of whom were told for years that it was too late to pursue a claim.
The law directly addresses the gap that existed after a 2023 Rhode Island Supreme Court ruling. In 2023, the Rhode Island Supreme Court ruled that the 2019 law only applied to suits against individual perpetrators, not the institutions or supervisors who enabled them. H-7200a/S-2616a corrects that by specifically targeting institutions and supervisors, including the Diocese of Providence, which administered CYO programs across Rhode Island.
The new law specifically targets institutions and organizations such as churches, schools, youth programs, healthcare facilities and sports leagues, as well as supervisors. CYO programs fall squarely within this definition. If the Diocese of Providence knew about abuse in its youth programs and failed to act, survivors may now have a direct legal claim against the institution itself.
For survivors whose claims were previously time-barred, this window may be the only opportunity to seek civil accountability. The window closes on June 30, 2028, and claims not filed by that date may be permanently barred. Time matters, and speaking with a sexual abuse lawyer now gives you the best chance to understand your rights before that deadline passes.
Who Can Be Held Legally Responsible for CYO Abuse in Rhode Island
Rhode Island’s new law makes clear that legal responsibility for child sexual abuse does not rest solely with the individual who committed the abuse. Institutions and supervisors who enabled or covered up abuse can also be held accountable. For CYO survivors, this opens the door to claims against the Diocese of Providence itself, individual parishes, and any supervisors who knew about abuse and failed to act.
The Diocese of Providence administered CYO programs through its Office of Catholic Youth Ministry. Priests assigned to parishes ran youth sports leagues, retreats, and after-school programs under Diocesan oversight. When a priest used that access to abuse a child, and the Diocese knew or should have known about the risk, the institution bears legal responsibility for that harm.
The Attorney General’s report documented that the Diocese had notice of abuse allegations against numerous clergy members and still returned those priests to ministry. In some cases, accused priests were reassigned to hospitals, schools, and youth programs after complaints were made. That kind of deliberate reassignment, rather than removal, is exactly the type of institutional enabling that H-7200a/S-2616a now allows survivors to litigate.
Survivors may also have claims against individual supervisors who had direct knowledge of abuse and took no action to protect children. Rhode Island law recognizes that a supervisor’s deliberate inaction, when they had the authority and responsibility to intervene, can give rise to civil liability. This applies to pastors, Diocesan administrators, and others in the chain of authority over CYO programs.
If you were abused in a Rhode Island CYO program and are unsure whether you have a claim against the Diocese or another institution, speaking with a sexual assault lawyer at Sommers Schwartz can help you get a clear answer based on the specific facts of your situation.
What Survivors of CYO Abuse in Rhode Island Should Know Before Coming Forward
Coming forward about sexual abuse is one of the hardest decisions a person can make. Many CYO survivors carry their experiences for decades before speaking about them. Trauma, shame, fear of not being believed, and the deep trust placed in the Church all contribute to delayed disclosure. None of that delay reflects on your credibility or your right to seek justice. Rhode Island’s new law was written with this reality in mind.
The revival window created by H-7200a/S-2616a runs from July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2028. All time-barred claims must be filed by June 30, 2028, or they may be forever barred. That deadline is firm, which means starting the process now gives you the most time to gather information, work with an attorney, and make informed decisions.
You do not need to have a police report, a prior complaint, or any documentation to speak with an attorney. A civil claim is separate from a criminal case. You control the process. Sommers Schwartz handles these cases with full respect for your privacy, and Rhode Island courts allow survivors to file as Jane Doe or John Doe in appropriate circumstances, which can protect your identity throughout the litigation process.
The Attorney General’s 2026 report named dozens of priests with credible abuse allegations connected to the Diocese of Providence, including priests who served in CYO programs, schools, and parish settings across the state. If a priest who abused you is on that list, or even if they are not, your experience still matters and your claim deserves to be evaluated.
Sommers Schwartz represents survivors of clergy and institutional abuse across Rhode Island. The attorneys at this firm understand what you have been through, and they are prepared to stand with you. Reaching out for a confidential consultation costs you nothing and carries no obligation. You deserve to know where you stand.
FAQs About CYO Sexual Abuse Claims in Rhode Island
What is the CYO, and how was it connected to the Diocese of Providence?
The Catholic Youth Organization (CYO) is a parish-based program offering sports, retreats, and other activities for children and teenagers. In Rhode Island, CYO programs operated under the authority of the Diocese of Providence. Priests and adult volunteers ran these programs, giving them regular and often unsupervised access to minors. The Rhode Island Attorney General’s 2026 report confirmed that this access was exploited in multiple documented cases of abuse.
Does Rhode Island’s new law apply to abuse that happened decades ago in a CYO program?
Yes. Rhode Island’s H-7200a/S-2616a, signed by Governor Dan McKee on June 11, 2026, and effective July 1, 2026, creates a two-year revival window for claims that were previously time-barred. This means survivors who were told it was too late to file a lawsuit may now have a legal path forward. The window runs from July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2028. Claims not filed by that date may be permanently barred.
Can I sue the Diocese of Providence, not just the individual priest who abused me?
Rhode Island’s new law specifically allows survivors to bring claims against institutions and supervisors accused of enabling or covering up sexual abuse. If the Diocese of Providence knew about a priest’s abusive behavior and failed to remove him from CYO or other youth programs, the Diocese may be held legally responsible. An attorney can evaluate the specific facts of your case to determine who may be liable.
What if I am not sure whether the priest who abused me was officially connected to a CYO program?
You do not need to know the exact program title or administrative structure to pursue a claim. What matters is whether a priest or other adult in a Diocese-supervised setting abused you. Sommers Schwartz can help investigate the specific circumstances of your abuse, including which programs were active at your parish, which priests served there, and whether the Diocese had prior notice of complaints against that individual.
Is my identity protected if I file a lawsuit about CYO abuse in Rhode Island?
Rhode Island courts allow survivors to file civil lawsuits using a pseudonym, such as Jane Doe or John Doe, in appropriate circumstances. This can protect your identity from public disclosure throughout the litigation process. Your attorney can advise you on whether this option applies to your case and how to request it. Sommers Schwartz handles all consultations with strict confidentiality, and you are under no obligation after your first conversation.
More Resources About Parish & Diocesan Institution Locations
- St. Mary’s Church, Cranston
- Our Lady of Mercy, East Greenwich
- St. Aloysius Home, Smithfield
- Jesus Savior Church, Newport
- St. Matthew Church, Cranston
- St. Mary Church, Bristol
- Our Lady of Mt. Carmel Church, Providence
- St. Raphael Academy, Pawtucket
- St. Joseph Church, Woonsocket
- St. Margaret Church, East Providence
- St. Anthony Church, North Providence
- Immaculate Conception Church, Cranston
- St. Jude’s Parish, Lincoln
- St. Michael Church, Providence
We fight hard. And we win.
News & Case Alerts
Read related articles and learn about recently filed cases.
Working with Tad Roumayah
I can’t say enough good things about working with Tad Roumayah. From our very first conversation, he was attentive, straightforward, and genuinely invested in getting the best outcome for my case. He took the time to explain everything clearly, answered my questions (even the ones I asked more than once)…
Praise for Alexis Amy and Tad Roumayah
I am very happy with the settlement Sommers Schwartz obtained for me in my age and disability discrimination case.Tad Roumayah and Alexis Amy explained every step of the process and answered all my questions along the way.I highly recommend this law firm!
I Cannot Say Enough Good Things About This Law Firm and My Attorney, Matthew G. Curtis.
I cannot say enough good things about this law firm and my attorney, Matthew G. Curtis. From the very beginning, their professionalism, communication, and attention to detail stood out immediately. They kept me informed throughout the entire process, answered my questions promptly, and always made me feel like a priority…
From a Wayne State Medical School Student About Judy Susskind
Law & Medicine was truly one of my favorite rotations – seeing a trial and learning from you was a privilege. Medical students are so lucky to have such an incredible preceptor for this experience. Your firm, colleagues, and clients are lucky to have you. (From a Wayne State University…
Praise for Tad Roumayah and Nathan Robbins
Tad Roumayah and Nathan Robbins are very professional and knowledgeable. They took charge from beginning to end with my employment case. I highly recommend them.
A Recommendation for Matthew Curtis and David Black
I highly recommend Matthew Curtis and David Black. They represented me in a legal malpractice case and did an outstanding job. They were very responsive, organized, efficient, and easy to work with throughout the entire process. What I appreciated most was that they were willing to take my case when…
Thank You, Jason Thompson
I just wanted to say thank you, Jason. The amount of work that you have done is astronomical, and it hasn’t gone unnoticed. We’ve always felt that you do what you say, take responsibility for your actions, even when you’re wrong, and that your word is your bond. (We found…
Heartfelt Thanks to Judy Susskind
Judy, I wanted to inform you that my mother passed away last night after losing a painful battle. She wanted me to specifically contact you and thank you for what you did for her. You took a chance and stood by her when no one else would, and you helped…
Our Clients Say It Best





