Sommers Schwartz, P.C.

Michigan Attorneys at Law

  • FREE CONSULTATION
  • 800.783.0989
    248.355.0300 (LOCAL)
  • Email Us
  • Home
  • About
    • Overview
    • Client Testimonials
    • Attorney Referrals
    • Careers
  • Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Birth Injury
    • Personal Injury
    • Class Action
    • Employment
    • Commercial Law & Intellectual Property
  • Accomplishments
    • Representative Cases
    • Verdicts & Settlements
  • Resources
    • In The News
    • Videos
  • Contact
  • Blog
    • Birth Injury
    • Class Action
    • Commercial Law & Intellectual Property
    • Employment
    • Firm News
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Personal Injury

Sixth Court Finds FedEx Wrongfully Terminated Employee by Failing to Advise of FMLA Procedures

October 14, 2014 by Jason J. Thompson

Medical Leave Form

Upholding a previous ruling, the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals recently found that FedEx Corp. wrongfully terminated an employee by not properly explaining the consequences of the employee’s failure to submit medical certification forms to extend her Family & Medical Leave Act period.

As reported in Law360 (subscription required), Tina Wallace had been employed by FedEx for 21 years. By 2007, she developed health issues that caused her to take an absence pursuant to the federal Family & Medical Leave Act (FMLA). She was granted a two-week leave, during which her doctor gave her documents that would have provided for additional time off work. Wallace failed to submit the forms to FedEx, which she later claimed was the result of her ill health. Two days after the forms were due, she was terminated.

Wallace then filed a lawsuit in 2008, alleging that FedEx violated her FMLA rights when company representatives asked her verbally to complete a medical-certification form, but without explaining the consequences of failing to complete the form. After a magistrate judge dismissed her claims for liquidated damages and back pay, a federal jury found in the plaintiff’s favor, awarding her $173,000 in damages. The judge then reduced the verdict, prompting Wallace’s appeal.

The Sixth Circuit panel reinstated the $173,000 jury award, citing the magistrate judge’s failure to offer the plaintiff the option of a new trial instead of the reduced award, and his impermissible reweighing of the evidence in reaching the decision to reduce the verdict.

FedEx argued on appeal that the plaintiff was ineligible for FMLA leave because she never submitted the requisite medical-certification form; by extension, if she was not on an FMLA leave, the company could not have interfered with it as a matter of law. The appellate court disagreed, finding that a jury could have reasonably concluded Wallace did provide FedEx with sufficient notice of her intent to take an FMLA leave, and that FedEx failed to give her sufficient notice about the consequences of failing to return the forms. The court also rejected the claim that FedEx legitimately terminated Wallace for failing to comply with its attendance policy, separate and distinct from her FMLA leave.

This decision makes clear that both employees and employers need to know their rights and obligations under the FMLA. The attorneys in Sommers Schwartz’s Employment Group are well versed in the this area of the law, so if you have questions or concerns regarding the FMLA, please contact us today – we’re here to help.

Share on LinkedIn Share
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Google Plus Share
Share on Facebook Share
1

Categories: Employment

About Jason J. Thompson

Jason Thompson is a nationally board certified trial attorney and co-chairs Sommers Schwartz’s Complex Litigation Department. He has a formidable breadth of litigation experience, including class action and multidistrict litigation (MDL), and practices nationwide in both state and federal courts.
View all posts by Jason J. Thompson →

Recent Posts

  • Can Your Employer Legally Hijack Your Lunch Break?
  • What You Need to Know About Anesthesiology Malpractice
  • Does a Doctor’s Failure to Use AI to Diagnose a Patient Constitute Medical Malpractice?

Categories

  • Birth Injury (19)
  • Case Alerts (2)
  • Class Action (321)
  • Commercial Law & Intellectual Property (37)
  • Employment (341)
  • Firm News (33)
  • Medical Malpractice (140)
  • Personal Injury (112)
  • Railroaders (5)
  • Uncategorized (1)

Connect With Us

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Search

Archived By Month

  • April 2018 (11)
  • March 2018 (9)
  • February 2018 (13)
  • January 2018 (5)
  • December 2017 (6)
  • November 2017 (21)
  • October 2017 (19)
  • September 2017 (10)
  • August 2017 (1)
  • July 2017 (10)
  • June 2017 (7)
  • May 2017 (7)
  • April 2017 (9)
  • March 2017 (15)
  • February 2017 (13)
  • January 2017 (11)
  • December 2016 (11)
  • November 2016 (7)
  • October 2016 (8)
  • September 2016 (10)
  • August 2016 (12)
  • July 2016 (8)
  • June 2016 (9)
  • May 2016 (15)
  • April 2016 (18)
  • March 2016 (17)
  • February 2016 (13)
  • January 2016 (15)
  • December 2015 (12)
  • November 2015 (15)
  • October 2015 (17)
  • September 2015 (11)
  • August 2015 (16)
  • July 2015 (17)
  • June 2015 (16)
  • May 2015 (10)
  • April 2015 (5)
  • March 2015 (12)
  • February 2015 (22)
  • January 2015 (13)
  • December 2014 (6)
  • November 2014 (5)
  • October 2014 (15)
  • September 2014 (7)
  • August 2014 (8)
  • July 2014 (10)
  • June 2014 (9)
  • May 2014 (12)
  • April 2014 (5)
  • March 2014 (6)
  • February 2014 (10)
  • January 2014 (11)
  • December 2013 (10)
  • November 2013 (8)
  • October 2013 (13)
  • September 2013 (9)
  • August 2013 (14)
  • July 2013 (8)
  • May 2013 (1)
  • April 2013 (1)
  • March 2013 (1)
  • January 2013 (2)
  • December 2012 (2)
  • November 2012 (2)
  • September 2012 (2)
  • July 2012 (6)
  • June 2012 (1)
  • April 2012 (1)
  • March 2012 (4)
  • February 2012 (3)
  • January 2012 (7)
  • December 2011 (1)
  • November 2011 (1)
  • December 2010 (1)
  • November 2010 (1)
 
1 Towne Square, #1700, Southfield, MI 48076    Directions →    Phone: 248.355.0300
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn


The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation.
This information on this website is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing of this information does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2017 Sommers Schwartz, P.C.. All Rights Reserved. Privacy/Legal | Sitemap