Sommers Schwartz, P.C.

Michigan Attorneys at Law

  • FREE CONSULTATION
  • 800.783.0989
    248.355.0300 (LOCAL)
  • Email Us
  • Home
  • About
    • Overview
    • Client Testimonials
    • Attorney Referrals
    • Careers
  • Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Birth Injury
    • Personal Injury
    • Class Action
    • Employment
    • Commercial Law & Intellectual Property
  • Accomplishments
    • Representative Cases
    • Verdicts & Settlements
  • Resources
    • In The News
    • Videos
  • Contact
  • Blog
    • Birth Injury
    • Class Action
    • Commercial Law & Intellectual Property
    • Employment
    • Firm News
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Personal Injury

Trump Department of Labor Brings Back Opinion Letters; Reissues Bush Era Opinions

February 3, 2018 by Charles Ash, IV

US Labor Dept

After a seven-year absence, advisory opinion letters regarding the application of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) are back at the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL).

For five decades, the DOL issued such opinion letters in response to questions submitted by employers, employees, and others seeking guidance about what the FLSA required in specific factual situations.  In 2010, the DOL announced it would no longer be issuing opinion letters and instead replaced them with “Administrator Interpretations” (AI). These statements only provided general guidance regarding the law’s application rather than fact-specific responses.

CALL US
1.800.783.0989
Free
Consultation

The elimination of opinion letters was seen as a positive development for employees because employers often relied on those letters in their defense against FLSA claims. Employers would assert that any alleged violations they made based on the contents of an opinion letter were not willful and were made in good faith. Successfully raising a good faith defense shields employers from exposure to the FLSA’s liquidated (double) damages penalties.

The DOL’s June 2017 announcement that it was reinstating the practice of issuing opinion letters is thus a big setback for the rights of employees. Employers are once again free to argue that their alleged FLSA violations were made in good faith based on their reliance on an opinion letter that may, or may not, apply to the case at hand.

On January 5, 2018, the DOL reissued more than a dozen George W. Bush-era advisory opinion letters which had been rescinded during the Obama administration.  These letters covered several topics, including whether certain employees qualify for recognized exemptions under the FLSA and whether certain job bonuses must be included in an individual’s regular pay rate for purposes of calculating overtime. These letters will likely give employers additional protection against employee FLSA lawsuits.

The DOL is not expected to issue new opinion letters until after a new Wage and Hour Division administrator is in place at the DOL. Cheryl Stanton, a defense attorney who most recently served as the head of the South Carolina Department of Employment and Workforce, was recently nominated for the position.  Her nomination

Share on LinkedIn Share
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Google Plus Share
Share on Facebook Share
0

Categories: Class Action, Employment

Practice Areas: Employment

About Charles Ash, IV

Charles R. Ash, IV is an associate in Sommers Schwartz’s Complex Litigation groups. A substantial portion of Rob’s practice is devoted to collective and class actions arising under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and similar state laws, and he appears in state and federal courts across the United States to represent employees against their corporate employers. View all posts by Charles Ash IV →

Recent Posts

  • What You Need to Know About Anesthesiology Malpractice
  • Does a Doctor’s Failure to Use AI to Diagnose a Patient Constitute Medical Malpractice?
  • Autonomous Vehicle Accidents: Who’s Liable

Categories

  • Birth Injury (19)
  • Case Alerts (2)
  • Class Action (320)
  • Commercial Law & Intellectual Property (37)
  • Employment (340)
  • Firm News (33)
  • Medical Malpractice (140)
  • Personal Injury (112)
  • Railroaders (5)
  • Uncategorized (1)

Connect With Us

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Search

Archived By Month

  • April 2018 (10)
  • March 2018 (9)
  • February 2018 (13)
  • January 2018 (5)
  • December 2017 (6)
  • November 2017 (21)
  • October 2017 (19)
  • September 2017 (10)
  • August 2017 (1)
  • July 2017 (10)
  • June 2017 (7)
  • May 2017 (7)
  • April 2017 (9)
  • March 2017 (15)
  • February 2017 (13)
  • January 2017 (11)
  • December 2016 (11)
  • November 2016 (7)
  • October 2016 (8)
  • September 2016 (10)
  • August 2016 (12)
  • July 2016 (8)
  • June 2016 (9)
  • May 2016 (15)
  • April 2016 (18)
  • March 2016 (17)
  • February 2016 (13)
  • January 2016 (15)
  • December 2015 (12)
  • November 2015 (15)
  • October 2015 (17)
  • September 2015 (11)
  • August 2015 (16)
  • July 2015 (17)
  • June 2015 (16)
  • May 2015 (10)
  • April 2015 (5)
  • March 2015 (12)
  • February 2015 (22)
  • January 2015 (13)
  • December 2014 (6)
  • November 2014 (5)
  • October 2014 (15)
  • September 2014 (7)
  • August 2014 (8)
  • July 2014 (10)
  • June 2014 (9)
  • May 2014 (12)
  • April 2014 (5)
  • March 2014 (6)
  • February 2014 (10)
  • January 2014 (11)
  • December 2013 (10)
  • November 2013 (8)
  • October 2013 (13)
  • September 2013 (9)
  • August 2013 (14)
  • July 2013 (8)
  • May 2013 (1)
  • April 2013 (1)
  • March 2013 (1)
  • January 2013 (2)
  • December 2012 (2)
  • November 2012 (2)
  • September 2012 (2)
  • July 2012 (6)
  • June 2012 (1)
  • April 2012 (1)
  • March 2012 (4)
  • February 2012 (3)
  • January 2012 (7)
  • December 2011 (1)
  • November 2011 (1)
  • December 2010 (1)
  • November 2010 (1)
 
1 Towne Square, #1700, Southfield, MI 48076    Directions →    Phone: 248.355.0300
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn


The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation.
This information on this website is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing of this information does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2017 Sommers Schwartz, P.C.. All Rights Reserved. Privacy/Legal | Sitemap