Sommers Schwartz, P.C.

Michigan Attorneys at Law

  • FREE CONSULTATION
  • 800.783.0989
    248.355.0300 (LOCAL)
  • Email Us
  • Home
  • About
    • Overview
    • Client Testimonials
    • Attorney Referrals
    • Careers
  • Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Birth Injury
    • Personal Injury
    • Class Action
    • Employment
    • Commercial Law & Intellectual Property
  • Accomplishments
    • Representative Cases
    • Verdicts & Settlements
  • Resources
    • Firm News
    • Videos
  • Contact
  • Blog
    • Birth Injury
    • Class Action
    • Commercial Law & Intellectual Property
    • Employment
    • Firm News
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Personal Injury

Are Railroad Injury Damages Taxable as Compensation?

June 4, 2018 by Ben Wilensky

Railroad worker injuries

The U.S. Supreme Court is set to decide a Minnesota case with nation-wide tax consequences for railroad companies and injured railroad workers who are awarded lost wages.

CALL US
1.800.783.0989
Free
Consultation

The question presented in BNSF Railway Co v. Loos is significant: whether payroll taxes are deductible from the amount owed an employee for lost wages in connection with an on-the-job personal injury. The issue is a pressing one, given that more than 4,000 railroad worker injuries occur each year, involving millions of dollars in lost-wage payouts.

While both state and federal courts across the country have already addressed the question, the courts have produced conflicting answers. Now, the U.S. Supreme Court is ready to settle the matter once and for all, having placed the appeal on its October 2018 docket.

Railroader Injury Damages

Michael Loos worked as a brakeman, switchman, and conductor at BNSF Railway for 15 years. In 2010, he injured his knee in BNSF’s train yard and missed several months of work. Loos was fired two years after the injury, reportedly for having too many absences.

Loos filed a lawsuit against BNSF, alleging it was liable under the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA) for negligently causing his knee injury. He also brought a whistleblower retaliation claim under the Federal Railroad Safety Act (FRSA), asserting he was dismissed, in part, because he had testified on behalf of two former co-workers in a retaliatory discharge case.

A Minnesota federal district court dismissed Loos’s FRSA claim. However, his FELA claim went to trial, and a jury awarded him more than $126,000 in damages ($85,000 for past pain, disability, and emotional distress; $30,000 for lost wages; and $11,212.78 for past medical expenses).

Subsequently, BNSF asked the trial court to offset Loos’s lost wages by the amount of taxes owed under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act (RRTA). The court denied the request, finding that no RRTA tax was owed. BNSF then withheld the amount of the disputed RRTA taxes from Loos’s payment, asserting it had paid $3,765 to the Internal Revenue Service as his share of payroll taxes.

On appeal, the Eighth Circuit affirmed the decision, finding that Loos’s railroad injury award was not taxable under the RRTA.

A Railroader’s Lost Wages Aren’t “Compensation”

In its opinion, the Eighth Circuit explained that, while damages for lost wages are paid to an individual, the RRTA considers it “compensation” only if it is paid for “services rendered as an employee.”

Looking at the language of the RRTA, the Eighth Circuit said that damages for lost wages are not payment for “services rendered.” Rather, damages for lost wages “compensate the employee for wages the employee should have earned had he been able to render services.”

The Court further observed that Congress included pay for time lost in the definition of “compensation” in the Railroad Retirement Act (RRA) while omitting it from the RRTA’s definition of “compensation.” This omission suggested that Congress “did not intend the RRTA to include pay for time lost,” the Court said. “We are not convinced that we should import from the RRA the very language Congress eliminated from the RRTA.”

Other Railroader Injury Compensation Rulings

The U.S. Sixth Circuit, which includes Michigan, has also addressed the taxation question. In Hance v Norfolk Southern Railway Co, the Sixth Circuit held that the RRTA requires employers to pay taxes on all compensation, including payments for lost wages, and that payroll taxes should be paid on an award to a railroad employee.

Notably, Hance involved a wrongful discharge claim and not a personal injury award. The employee had been awarded back pay and ordered reinstated to his former position with the railroad company, resulting in the railroad’s reporting of RRTA compensation.

Meanwhile, the Iowa and Nebraska state supreme courts have said the language of the RRTA is unclear as to whether lawmakers intended to include time lost in the definition of “taxable compensation.” Ultimately, both courts found that awards for lost wages are taxable.

The Missouri Supreme Court has ruled otherwise, relying on the exclusion of federal income taxes for personal injury awards. And currently, the same taxation question is pending before the Alabama and Illinois appellate courts.

In its petition asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the case, BNSF claimed the discord among the federal and state courts had created an “untenable” situation, particularly because BNSF has operations and railroad workers in 28 states. We will continue to monitor the case and report back when the Supreme Court renders a decision.

If you’re a railroader who has suffered an on-the-job injury or employment issue, contact Sommers Schwartz today. Our personal injury lawyers are skilled and experienced in the specific railroad laws that protect you.

Share on LinkedIn Share
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook Share
4

Categories: Railroaders

Practice Areas: Personal Injury

About Ben Wilensky

Ben Wilensky is a member of Sommers Schwartz’s Personal Injury Litigation Group and focuses his practice on representing railroad workers who seek compensation for on-the-job injuries under the Federal Employers' Liability Act.
View all posts by Ben Wilensky →

Recent Posts

  • Revelations about Pedophile Doctor Show How Hospitals May Be Negligent in Failing to Prevent Sexual Abuse
  • Questions to Ask When Selecting a Birth Injury Attorney
  • Call Center Employees Allege Intelenet America Deprived Them of Overtime Pay

Categories

  • Birth Injury (24)
  • Case Alerts (2)
  • Class Action (327)
  • Commercial Law & Intellectual Property (41)
  • Employment (349)
  • Firm News (42)
  • Medical Malpractice (157)
  • Personal Injury (129)
  • Railroaders (7)
  • Uncategorized (3)

Connect With Us

  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Search

Archived By Month

  • February 2019 (3)
  • January 2019 (2)
  • December 2018 (6)
  • November 2018 (4)
  • October 2018 (3)
  • September 2018 (14)
  • August 2018 (10)
  • July 2018 (2)
  • June 2018 (6)
  • May 2018 (15)
  • April 2018 (11)
  • March 2018 (9)
  • February 2018 (12)
  • January 2018 (5)
  • December 2017 (5)
  • November 2017 (21)
  • October 2017 (19)
  • September 2017 (10)
  • August 2017 (1)
  • July 2017 (10)
  • June 2017 (7)
  • May 2017 (7)
  • April 2017 (9)
  • March 2017 (15)
  • February 2017 (13)
  • January 2017 (11)
  • December 2016 (10)
  • November 2016 (7)
  • October 2016 (8)
  • September 2016 (10)
  • August 2016 (12)
  • July 2016 (8)
  • June 2016 (9)
  • May 2016 (15)
  • April 2016 (18)
  • March 2016 (17)
  • February 2016 (13)
  • January 2016 (15)
  • December 2015 (11)
  • November 2015 (13)
  • October 2015 (17)
  • September 2015 (11)
  • August 2015 (15)
  • July 2015 (17)
  • June 2015 (16)
  • May 2015 (8)
  • April 2015 (5)
  • March 2015 (12)
  • February 2015 (22)
  • January 2015 (13)
  • December 2014 (6)
  • November 2014 (5)
  • October 2014 (15)
  • September 2014 (7)
  • August 2014 (8)
  • July 2014 (10)
  • June 2014 (9)
  • May 2014 (12)
  • April 2014 (5)
  • March 2014 (6)
  • February 2014 (10)
  • January 2014 (11)
  • December 2013 (10)
  • November 2013 (8)
  • October 2013 (13)
  • September 2013 (9)
  • August 2013 (14)
  • July 2013 (8)
  • May 2013 (1)
  • April 2013 (1)
  • March 2013 (1)
  • January 2013 (2)
  • December 2012 (2)
  • November 2012 (2)
  • September 2012 (2)
  • July 2012 (6)
  • June 2012 (1)
  • April 2012 (1)
  • March 2012 (4)
  • February 2012 (3)
  • January 2012 (7)
  • December 2011 (1)
  • November 2011 (1)
  • December 2010 (1)
  • November 2010 (1)
 
1 Towne Square, #1700, Southfield, MI 48076    Directions →    Phone: 248.355.0300
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn


The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation.
This information on this website is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing of this information does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2019 Sommers Schwartz, P.C.. All Rights Reserved. Privacy/Legal | Sitemap