Sommers Schwartz is a powerhouse litigation firm that has recovered more than one billion dollars for our clients. When your future is on the line, our team will fight for you.

Clients say it best

I couldn’t have asked for better representation and counsel...

Attorney
Referrals

We can tackle some of the most complex matters in the litigation world.

Results

Year after year, our team delivers unmatched results for our clients.

Father Francis Xavier Battel served as a Diocese of Providence priest from his ordination in 1957 until he took a leave of absence in 1969, never returning to ministry. He is now among the 75 clergy members identified as credibly accused of child sexual misconduct in the Rhode Island Attorney General’s comprehensive report, released on March 4, 2026. If you or someone you love was harmed by Father Battel, you are not alone, and what happened was not your fault. A sexual abuse lawyer at Sommers Schwartz can help you understand your rights and your options under Rhode Island’s newest law.

Table of Contents

Who Was Father Francis Xavier Battel and What Did the Attorney General Find?

Father Francis Xavier Battel was ordained in 1957. He went on leave of absence in 1969 and did not return to ministry. He died in 1977. Despite his death, the allegations against him are documented in the official record, and that record matters deeply to survivors who deserve to be believed.

Father Battel’s assignment history included St. Mary Church in Pawtucket (1957), St. Joseph Church in Providence (1957 to 1962), LaSalle Academy in Providence (1958 to 1962), St. Lawrence Church in North Providence (1962 to 1963), LaSalle Academy again (1962 to 1963), Jesus Savior Church in Newport (1963 to 1964), Blessed Sacrament Church in Providence (1964 to 1967), St. Pius X Church in Westerly (1967 to 1968), and St. Mary Church in Pawtucket again (1968 to 1969), before taking a leave of absence.

The Rhode Island Attorney General’s Report, released on March 4, 2026, notes that the Diocese received a report in March 2010 that Battel sexually abused a boy, ages 14 to 15, in 1969, at St. Mary’s in Pawtucket. That report came more than four decades after the abuse allegedly occurred, a gap that reflects how long survivors often carry this pain before they are able to speak about it.

The accuser said that another boy ran into a CYO hall during that time and said that Battel molested or attacked him, and that Battel was moved from the parish a few days later. Battel took a leave of absence in 1969, “shortly after the reported incidents would have taken place,” according to the report. That timing raises serious questions about what diocesan leadership knew and when they knew it.

The Diocese of Providence’s Pattern of Reassigning Accused Priests

The Attorney General’s report accused the Catholic Diocese of Providence of a “well-worn pattern” of failing to remove dozens of priests accused of child sexual abuse and keeping the abuse secret over decades. Father Battel’s departure from St. Mary’s fits squarely within that pattern.

The Rhode Island AG’s report documents how accused clergy were moved rather than removed. This practice of moving the offending priests to another location provided them access to a new pool of victims to abuse, rather than addressing the problem at the source. Battel served at multiple parishes across Rhode Island over a 12-year span, including two separate stints at LaSalle Academy in Providence, a school with a student population of minors.

The report identified approximately 75 clergy members with credible allegations involving more than 300 minor children and described patterns in which accused clergy were reassigned and allegations were inconsistently reported to authorities. Father Battel was one of those 75. Francis Battel was not included on the diocese’s own list of the credibly accused until the Attorney General’s investigation surfaced the allegation and placed it in the official record.

The Diocese’s failure to disclose Battel’s name on its own list is a pattern that repeats across the AG’s findings. The Diocese also had a pattern of not reporting child sexual abuse complaints to law enforcement. Survivors who were harmed by Battel or by the institutional silence around him deserve answers, and they deserve a path to accountability.

Rhode Island’s New Child Sexual Abuse Law Opens a Two-Year Window for Survivors

Rhode Island’s new child sexual abuse law, H-7200a/S-2616a, changes everything for survivors who believed their legal options had expired. On June 11, 2026, Rhode Island Governor Dan McKee signed legislation giving survivors of childhood sexual abuse a new opportunity to pursue civil claims that would otherwise be permanently closed. The law opens a two-year revival window beginning July 1, 2026, and closing June 30, 2028.

The law amends the statute of limitations for claims of sexual abuse of a child and creates a two-year window for victims to bring otherwise time-barred claims against institutions and supervisors accused of enabling or covering up sexual abuse. This is not a small procedural change. It is a fundamental shift in who can be held accountable.

In 2023, the Rhode Island Supreme Court ruled that the 2019 law only applied to suits against individual perpetrators, not the institutions or supervisors who enabled them. H-7200a/S-2616a directly addresses that gap. Survivors can now pursue claims against the Diocese of Providence and other institutions that allegedly knew about abuse and failed to stop it.

Future claims must be filed by whichever date is later: either 35 years from the date of the abusive act (or age 53) or seven years from when the survivor first discovers or reasonably connects their adult injuries to the childhood abuse. For survivors whose claims were already time-barred before July 1, 2026, the revival window is the critical opportunity. All time-barred claims must be filed by June 30, 2028, or they may be forever barred.

Any person who was sexually abused by Father Francis Xavier Battel during his assignments across Rhode Island may have a civil claim worth exploring. His assignments spanned Providence, Pawtucket, North Providence, Newport, Westerly, and other communities, meaning survivors could be spread across the state.

Even though Father Battel died in 1977, civil claims in Rhode Island can target the institutions and supervisors who enabled the abuse. The new law specifically targets institutions and organizations such as churches, schools, youth programs, healthcare facilities and sports leagues, as well as supervisors. The Diocese of Providence, which received a formal abuse report in 2010 and had internal records related to Battel’s departure, is the kind of institution this law is designed to reach.

Survivors who were abused at LaSalle Academy, at a parish rectory, or in any other setting where Battel had access to children should know that their experience matters and their claim may still be viable. By temporarily suspending the statute of limitations for these claims, the legislation offers those who suffered trauma decades ago a chance to seek justice against a perpetrator and any other party that may have had some level of involvement in the claims, regardless of how much time has passed.

Speaking with a sexual assault lawyer who understands Rhode Island’s revival window is the best first step toward understanding whether your specific situation falls within the law’s reach. You do not need to have all the answers before you make that call.

Why Survivors Often Wait Decades to Come Forward

If you are reading this and wondering why it took so long for allegations against Father Battel to surface, the answer lies in how childhood sexual trauma works. The survivor who reported Battel’s abuse in 2010 waited more than 40 years. That delay is not unusual. It is, in fact, the norm.

The lookback window reflects a broader recognition that delayed disclosure is common in cases involving childhood sexual abuse. Shame, fear, self-doubt, and the authority that priests held over children and families all contribute to silence that can last a lifetime. When the abuser is a trusted figure in a child’s faith community, the barriers to disclosure are even higher.

Rhode Island lawmakers recognized this reality when they passed H-7200a/S-2616a. Lawmakers cited the findings of the Attorney General’s report as a key factor in advancing legislation to expand survivors’ ability to pursue civil claims. The law exists because the legal system finally acknowledged what survivors have always known: trauma does not follow a legal calendar.

You may have spent years questioning your memory, your worth, or whether anyone would believe you. The answer is yes, people believe you. The Attorney General’s report confirms that the Diocese had a systemic problem, and Father Battel’s name is in that report. Your experience is real. Your pain is valid. And your right to pursue justice is now protected by Rhode Island law.

How Sommers Schwartz Can Help Survivors of Father Battel’s Abuse

Sommers Schwartz represents survivors of clergy sexual abuse across Rhode Island and throughout the United States. The firm’s attorneys understand the unique legal and emotional challenges that come with these cases, and they approach every client with the respect and sensitivity that survivors deserve.

The two-year revival window created by H-7200a/S-2616a is now open, but it will not stay open forever. The new law establishes a two-year civil revival window that opens from July 1, 2026, to June 30, 2028. That means the time to act is now. Waiting until the deadline approaches can limit the time available to gather records, identify witnesses, and build a strong case.

Sommers Schwartz handles these cases on a contingency fee basis, meaning you pay nothing unless your case results in a recovery. There is no financial barrier to getting legal help. Your first conversation with our team is confidential, and you are never obligated to move forward after speaking with us.

If you were abused by Father Battel, or by any other priest within the Diocese of Providence, working with an experienced sexual assault attorney gives you the best chance of holding the right parties accountable before the window closes. Reach out to Sommers Schwartz today to start that conversation.

FAQs About Father Battel and Rhode Island Clergy Abuse Claims

Was Father Francis Xavier Battel officially identified as a credibly accused abuser?

Yes. Father Francis Xavier Battel is listed among the credibly accused clergy in the Rhode Island Attorney General’s report. The report notes that the Diocese received a report in March 2010 that Battel sexually abused a boy, ages 14 to 15, in 1969, at St. Mary’s in Pawtucket. His name appears in the Attorney General’s appendix as part of the official record of the Diocese of Providence investigation.

Can I still file a civil lawsuit even though Father Battel is deceased?

Yes. Rhode Island’s new law, H-7200a/S-2616a, allows survivors to bring claims against institutions and supervisors accused of enabling or covering up abuse, not just the individual perpetrator. The law creates a two-year window for victims to bring otherwise time-barred claims against institutions and supervisors accused of enabling or covering up sexual abuse. The Diocese of Providence, as the institution that employed and oversaw Father Battel, may be a proper defendant in your claim.

What is the deadline to file a claim under Rhode Island’s revival window?

The legislation (House Bill H-7200a / Senate Bill S-2616a) lifts the usual statute of limitations and establishes a window to file new claims from July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2028. If your claim was previously time-barred, you must file before that June 30, 2028 deadline or you risk losing your right to sue permanently. Speaking with an attorney as soon as possible gives your case the best foundation.

What if I am not sure whether what happened to me qualifies as abuse?

You do not need to have a legal opinion before you speak with an attorney. Many survivors are uncertain about labels and definitions, and that uncertainty is completely understandable. What matters is that something happened to you that caused harm. A compassionate attorney at Sommers Schwartz can listen to your experience, help you understand whether it may give rise to a legal claim, and answer your questions with no pressure and no obligation. What happened was not your fault, and you deserve to have someone in your corner.

Does filing a lawsuit mean I have to testify in court or be identified publicly?

Not necessarily. Rhode Island courts allow survivors to file civil cases using pseudonyms, such as “Jane Doe” or “John Doe,” to protect their identity. Many cases also resolve through settlement before trial, which means a public court proceeding may never be required. Sommers Schwartz will explain all of your options and work with you to protect your privacy throughout the legal process. Your comfort and safety matter as much as the outcome of your case.

More Resources About Clergy Abuse

A Trusted Authority

Our attorneys have been featured on local and national media outlets, including:

Sommers Schwartz has appeared in CNN, Today Show, ClickOnDetroit, NBC News, and ABC

Working with Tad Roumayah

I can’t say enough good things about working with Tad Roumayah. From our very first conversation, he was attentive, straightforward, and genuinely invested in getting the best outcome for my case. He took the time to explain everything clearly, answered my questions (even the ones I asked more than once)…

Praise for Alexis Amy and Tad Roumayah

I am very happy with the settlement Sommers Schwartz obtained for me in my age and disability discrimination case.Tad Roumayah and Alexis Amy explained every step of the process and answered all my questions along the way.I highly recommend this law firm!

I Cannot Say Enough Good Things About This Law Firm and My Attorney, Matthew G. Curtis.

I cannot say enough good things about this law firm and my attorney, Matthew G. Curtis. From the very beginning, their professionalism, communication, and attention to detail stood out immediately. They kept me informed throughout the entire process, answered my questions promptly, and always made me feel like a priority…

From a Wayne State Medical School Student About Judy Susskind

Law & Medicine was truly one of my favorite rotations – seeing a trial and learning from you was a privilege. Medical students are so lucky to have such an incredible preceptor for this experience. Your firm, colleagues, and clients are lucky to have you. (From a Wayne State University…

Praise for Tad Roumayah and Nathan Robbins

Tad Roumayah and Nathan Robbins are very professional and knowledgeable. They took charge from beginning to end with my employment case. I highly recommend them.

A Recommendation for Matthew Curtis and David Black

I highly recommend Matthew Curtis and David Black. They represented me in a legal malpractice case and did an outstanding job. They were very responsive, organized, efficient, and easy to work with throughout the entire process. What I appreciated most was that they were willing to take my case when…

Thank You, Jason Thompson

I just wanted to say thank you, Jason. The amount of work that you have done is astronomical, and it hasn’t gone unnoticed. We’ve always felt that you do what you say, take responsibility for your actions, even when you’re wrong, and that your word is your bond. (We found…

Heartfelt Thanks to Judy Susskind

Judy, I wanted to inform you that my mother passed away last night after losing a painful battle. She wanted me to specifically contact you and thank you for what you did for her. You took a chance and stood by her when no one else would, and you helped…

Our Clients Say It Best

Google Reviews
Over 200 5-star reviews on Google