Sommers Schwartz is a powerhouse litigation firm that has recovered more than one billion dollars for our clients. When your future is on the line, our team will fight for you.

Clients say it best

I couldn’t have asked for better representation and counsel...

Attorney
Referrals

We can tackle some of the most complex matters in the litigation world.

Results

Year after year, our team delivers unmatched results for our clients.

Father Joseph Abruzzese was a Catholic priest in the Diocese of Providence who pleaded no contest in 1994 to second-degree sexual assault of a teenage boy. His case is not a distant allegation or an unresolved rumor. It is a matter of criminal record, confirmed by the Rhode Island Attorney General’s March 2026 investigation, and a story that reveals how institutional silence can cause as much harm as the abuse itself. If you or someone you love was harmed by Father Abruzzese, you need to know that what happened was not your fault, your experience matters, and the law may now give you a path to justice that did not exist before.

Table of Contents

Who Is Father Joseph Abruzzese and What Did He Do?

Father Joseph Abruzzese was ordained as a Diocese of Providence priest on November 17, 1990. His assignments were brief. He served at Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary Church in North Providence, St. Francis de Sales Church in North Kingstown, and St. Anthony Church in North Providence before being placed on leave in November 1993.

Abruzzese pleaded no contest in 1994 to second-degree sexual assault for grabbing and fondling a 16-year-old boy in a local park. He was sentenced to five years’ probation and counseling. A nolo contendere plea, which is Latin for “no contest,” means the defendant does not admit guilt but accepts the punishment. In Rhode Island courts, it carries the same legal weight as a guilty plea for sentencing purposes.

Despite the criminal conviction, the Diocese allowed Abruzzese to remain a priest. According to the Rhode Island Attorney General’s report on child sexual abuse in the Diocese of Providence, Bishop Gelineau allowed him to reside in a rectory with church support even after the plea. The Diocese’s primary concern, as documented in internal correspondence, was avoiding public scandal rather than protecting potential victims.

Despite his plea, Abruzzese maintained that he was innocent, and he was allowed to reside at a church property. Bishop Tobin did not return Abruzzese to ministry, citing his concern that victims’ advocacy groups would immediately respond in a damaging manner. That framing, focused on reputation rather than accountability, is precisely what survivors and their families deserve to understand.

How the Diocese of Providence Responded to Father Abruzzese’s Conviction

The Diocese of Providence’s internal response to Father Abruzzese’s conviction followed a pattern documented throughout the Rhode Island Attorney General’s March 2026 report: prioritizing institutional reputation over transparency and victim safety. This response unfolded across multiple bishops and spanned nearly two decades.

After Abruzzese’s 1994 plea, Bishop Louis Gelineau permitted him to live in a rectory with church support. The need to avoid “scandal” was a driving factor in that decision. In November 2002, Bishop Robert Mulvee wrote to the Vatican to begin a canonical inquiry into the 1994 incident. His letter made clear that Abruzzese’s priestly faculties would remain restricted due to the public nature of the case as reported in media outlets, not because of a concern for the victim or potential future victims.

Bishop Thomas Tobin, who succeeded Mulvee, faced Abruzzese’s repeated requests to be restored to active ministry. In a July 13, 2012, letter to the Vatican, Bishop Tobin wrote that the “very probable reaction of both the media and victims’ advocacy groups” made reinstatement impossible, and that “the resulting scandal could be disastrous.” Tobin’s concern was damage control, not child safety.

Abruzzese was included on the Diocese’s July 1, 2019, list of credibly accused clergy, and he was also included in the March 4, 2026, Rhode Island Attorney General’s Report. His case is one of many that illustrate how the Diocese placed its own interests above the welfare of children in its care. Survivors who experienced abuse connected to this institutional failure deserve to have that context acknowledged and, where possible, addressed through legal action.

The Rhode Island Attorney General’s 2026 Report and What It Means for Survivors

The push for Rhode Island’s new child sexual abuse law was closely tied to a 284-page report released in March 2026 by Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha. The report documented more than 300 survivors of abuse within the Diocese of Providence and identified 75 clergy members with credible allegations of sexual misconduct dating back to 1950. It also outlined how the Diocese allegedly concealed that abuse for decades.

The Attorney General determined that 72 clergy had been credibly accused of child sexual misconduct in the Diocese of Providence, based on the totality of information in the office’s possession. Father Abruzzese is among those named. In deciding whether to include an accused individual, the Attorney General relied on records voluntarily produced by the Diocese of Providence, as well as law enforcement records, records of criminal and civil proceedings, victim and witness interviews, and publicly available information.

The report did not exist in isolation. It followed years of advocacy by survivors and watchdog organizations, and it directly prompted the Rhode Island General Assembly to act. Attorney General Neronha publicly supported the legislation, urging lawmakers to pass the bill and give survivors a meaningful window to seek justice. For anyone harmed by a Diocese of Providence priest, including Father Abruzzese, the report is both a validation of your experience and a foundation for potential civil claims. A sexual assault attorney familiar with the Attorney General’s findings can help you understand what this report means specifically for your situation.

Rhode Island’s New Child Sexual Abuse Law (H-7200A/S-2616A) and the Revival Window

Rhode Island’s new law amends the statute of limitations for claims of sexual abuse of a child and creates a two-year window for victims to bring otherwise time-barred claims against institutions and supervisors accused of enabling or covering up sexual abuse. The new law takes effect on July 1, 2026.

The new law establishes a two-year civil “revival window” that opens from July 1, 2026, to June 30, 2028. During this 24-month period, survivors can file civil suits even if the statute of limitations on their claims had previously expired. This is a significant shift. Before this law, many survivors who waited to come forward, for any reason, lost their legal right to sue entirely.

In 2023, the Rhode Island Supreme Court ruled that the 2019 law only applied to suits against individual perpetrators, not the institutions or supervisors who enabled them. The new law, H-7200A/S-2616A, directly addresses that gap. The new law specifically targets institutions and organizations such as churches, schools, youth programs, healthcare facilities, and sports leagues, as well as supervisors.

For survivors whose claims relate to Father Abruzzese or the Diocese of Providence’s handling of his case, this window is critical. All time-barred claims must be filed by June 30, 2028, or they may be forever barred. The clock is running. Speaking with a sexual abuse lawyer now gives you the best chance to understand your rights before that deadline arrives. You do not have to have everything figured out before you make that call. The attorneys at Sommers Schwartz will listen and help you understand your options without pressure.

If you were abused by Father Abruzzese, or by any other priest in the Diocese of Providence, you have rights under Rhode Island law. What happened to you was not your fault. Abuse by a trusted religious figure is a profound violation, and the shame and confusion that survivors often feel belong entirely to the people who caused the harm, not to those who suffered it.

Civil claims against the Diocese of Providence and its supervisors are now possible under the revival window created by H-7200A/S-2616A. A civil lawsuit is separate from any criminal proceeding. It allows survivors to seek accountability and compensation from the institutions that failed to protect them. The Diocese’s documented pattern of prioritizing reputation over child safety, as laid out in the Attorney General’s 2026 report, is directly relevant to claims of institutional enabling and cover-up.

Sommers Schwartz represents survivors of clergy sexual abuse across Rhode Island and multiple states. Our attorneys understand the trauma involved in coming forward, and we approach every case with compassion and respect for your experience. We know that reaching out is not easy. We also know that for many survivors, taking that step is a meaningful part of reclaiming control over their own story. Whether your abuse happened at St. Anthony Church in North Providence, St. Francis de Sales Church in North Kingstown, or anywhere else connected to Father Abruzzese’s assignments, we want to hear from you.

If you are considering a claim and want to understand what the revival window means for your specific situation, a sexual assault lawyer at Sommers Schwartz is ready to speak with you in confidence. There is no obligation, and your privacy is protected throughout the process.

FAQs About Father John Abruzzese and Rhode Island Clergy Abuse Claims

Was Father Joseph Abruzzese criminally convicted of sexual assault?

Yes. Father Joseph Abruzzese pleaded no contest in 1994 to second-degree sexual assault involving a 16-year-old boy in Rhode Island. He was sentenced to five years’ probation and counseling. A no-contest plea carries the same legal effect as a guilty plea for sentencing purposes under Rhode Island law. He was subsequently suspended from ministry and placed on the Diocese of Providence’s credibly accused clergy list in July 2019. He is also named in the Rhode Island Attorney General’s March 2026 report on clergy abuse in the Diocese of Providence.

Can I still file a civil lawsuit related to Father Abruzzese even if the abuse happened decades ago?

Possibly, yes. Rhode Island’s new law, H-7200A/S-2616A, signed by Governor Dan McKee on June 11, 2026, and effective July 1, 2026, creates a two-year revival window for survivors to bring otherwise time-barred civil claims against institutions and supervisors accused of enabling or covering up sexual abuse. That window runs from July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2028. If your claim was previously blocked by the statute of limitations, this window may reopen the courthouse doors for you. Speaking with an attorney as soon as possible gives you the most time to prepare your case before the window closes.

Does the new Rhode Island law allow me to sue the Diocese of Providence, not just the priest?

Yes. The 2023 Rhode Island Supreme Court ruling had limited the prior 2019 law to claims against individual perpetrators only. The new law, H-7200A/S-2616A, was specifically designed to address that gap. It creates a two-year window for survivors to bring claims against institutions and supervisors accused of enabling or covering up sexual abuse. This means the Diocese of Providence, as an institution, can now be named in civil claims brought during the revival window for its role in concealing or failing to address abuse.

What if I am not sure whether what happened to me qualifies as sexual abuse?

You do not need to have a legal definition in mind before you reach out to an attorney. Sexual abuse takes many forms, and the shame or uncertainty you may feel is a common response to trauma, not a reflection of whether your experience was real or serious. Rhode Island law defines sexual assault broadly, and second-degree sexual assault, the charge to which Abruzzese pleaded no contest, covers unwanted sexual contact that does not require force. If a priest or other trusted figure touched you in a sexual way without your consent, especially when you were a minor, that experience deserves to be heard. Contact Sommers Schwartz for a confidential conversation with no obligation.

How does Sommers Schwartz handle cases involving survivors of clergy abuse?

Sommers Schwartz approaches every clergy abuse case with a trauma-informed perspective. We understand that survivors often carry this harm for years or decades before feeling ready to come forward, and we never rush or pressure clients. Our attorneys represent survivors across Rhode Island and multiple states, and we have deep knowledge of the Diocese of Providence’s documented history of abuse and institutional cover-up. We handle these cases on a contingency basis, which means you pay no attorney fees unless we recover compensation for you. Your first conversation with us is confidential, and your identity is protected throughout the legal process.

More Resources About Clergy Abuse

A Trusted Authority

Our attorneys have been featured on local and national media outlets, including:

Sommers Schwartz has appeared in CNN, Today Show, ClickOnDetroit, NBC News, and ABC

Working with Tad Roumayah

I can’t say enough good things about working with Tad Roumayah. From our very first conversation, he was attentive, straightforward, and genuinely invested in getting the best outcome for my case. He took the time to explain everything clearly, answered my questions (even the ones I asked more than once)…

Praise for Alexis Amy and Tad Roumayah

I am very happy with the settlement Sommers Schwartz obtained for me in my age and disability discrimination case.Tad Roumayah and Alexis Amy explained every step of the process and answered all my questions along the way.I highly recommend this law firm!

I Cannot Say Enough Good Things About This Law Firm and My Attorney, Matthew G. Curtis.

I cannot say enough good things about this law firm and my attorney, Matthew G. Curtis. From the very beginning, their professionalism, communication, and attention to detail stood out immediately. They kept me informed throughout the entire process, answered my questions promptly, and always made me feel like a priority…

From a Wayne State Medical School Student About Judy Susskind

Law & Medicine was truly one of my favorite rotations – seeing a trial and learning from you was a privilege. Medical students are so lucky to have such an incredible preceptor for this experience. Your firm, colleagues, and clients are lucky to have you. (From a Wayne State University…

Praise for Tad Roumayah and Nathan Robbins

Tad Roumayah and Nathan Robbins are very professional and knowledgeable. They took charge from beginning to end with my employment case. I highly recommend them.

A Recommendation for Matthew Curtis and David Black

I highly recommend Matthew Curtis and David Black. They represented me in a legal malpractice case and did an outstanding job. They were very responsive, organized, efficient, and easy to work with throughout the entire process. What I appreciated most was that they were willing to take my case when…

Thank You, Jason Thompson

I just wanted to say thank you, Jason. The amount of work that you have done is astronomical, and it hasn’t gone unnoticed. We’ve always felt that you do what you say, take responsibility for your actions, even when you’re wrong, and that your word is your bond. (We found…

Heartfelt Thanks to Judy Susskind

Judy, I wanted to inform you that my mother passed away last night after losing a painful battle. She wanted me to specifically contact you and thank you for what you did for her. You took a chance and stood by her when no one else would, and you helped…

Our Clients Say It Best

Google Reviews
Over 200 5-star reviews on Google