Brother Raphael Edes served at St. Raphael Academy in Pawtucket, Rhode Island for nearly two decades. During that time, he held a position of trust and authority over the young students in his care. What has emerged since then is a deeply troubling record of credible sexual abuse allegations, institutional silence, and a survivor community that deserves answers, accountability, and a real path to justice.
Table of Contents
- Who Is Brother Raphael Edes and What Did He Do at St. Raphael Academy?
- What the Rhode Island Attorney General’s Report Revealed About Edes and the Diocese
- How Rhode Island’s New Child Sexual Abuse Law (H-7200A/S-2616A) Affects Survivors
- Why Institutions Like the Christian Brothers and the Diocese May Be Held Liable
- What Survivors of Brother Raphael Edes Should Do Before the Window Closes
- FAQs About Brother Raphael Edes and Rhode Island Clergy Abuse Claims
Who Is Brother Raphael Edes and What Did He Do at St. Raphael Academy?
Brother Raphael Edes is a member of the De La Salle Christian Brothers, a Catholic religious order that staffed St. Raphael Academy in Pawtucket, Rhode Island. He entered the De La Salle Christian Brothers order in 1957 and taught at LaSalle Military Academy in Oakdale, New York before being assigned to St. Raphael’s Academy in Pawtucket, Rhode Island, where he served from 1978 to 1994. That is sixteen years in direct contact with students.
According to the Rhode Island Attorney General’s Office, the allegations against Edes are serious and span multiple victims. Edes is accused of abusing two male students between 1986 and 1990 while working at St. Raphael Academy. A third allegation traces back to his time at LaSalle Military Academy in New York.
He allegedly admitted to state police investigators in 2025 that he had “sexual contact with one of these complainants but claimed that it was consensual; he denied sexually abusing the other complainant.” This admission is significant. Edes is, as of this writing, still living, making him one of the only living members of the credibly accused clergy identified in the Rhode Island Attorney General’s March 2026 report.
If you were a student at St. Raphael Academy and experienced abuse at the hands of Edes or anyone else connected to that institution, what happened was not your fault. You are not alone, and you have legal options worth exploring with a qualified sexual assault lawyer who understands the specific circumstances of Rhode Island clergy abuse claims.
What the Rhode Island Attorney General’s Report Revealed About Edes and the Diocese
The Rhode Island Attorney General’s March 2026 report is a comprehensive, 284-page investigation into clergy sexual abuse within the Diocese of Providence. The report documented more than 300 survivors of abuse within the Diocese of Providence and identified 75 clergy members with credible allegations of sexual misconduct dating back to 1950. Brother Raphael Edes is among those named.
What makes the Edes situation particularly troubling is how the Diocese handled the allegations. The first complaint against Edes came in 1994, when an attorney for one of the alleged victims filed a complaint with the diocese, alleging sexual abuse between 1986 and 1990. The only recorded response was a memo that the complaint was received by Office of Education and Compliance Director Robert McCarthy. There is no documented follow-up investigation.
The Attorney General’s report further reveals that Edes was not placed on the Diocese’s own Credibly Accused List, despite the weight of the evidence against him. According to the report, in 2018, a Diocese official deemed one complainant credible and noted that Edes had two additional credible allegations on file with the Congregation of Christian Brothers. A Review Board discussed Edes in early 2019, yet he was still excluded from the Diocese’s published list. The attorney general’s office found 20 credibly accused clergy who were never put on the diocese’s lists, although only one of the 20 is living: Raphael Edes.
This pattern, where credible allegations are received, documented, and then quietly shelved, is exactly what the Attorney General’s report describes as institutional failure. The Diocese’s handling of Edes mirrors the broader conduct described throughout the report, and it is a key reason why Rhode Island’s new child sexual abuse law was necessary. The Rhode Island Attorney General’s Clergy Abuse Report offers a fuller picture of how this pattern played out across dozens of cases and many years.
How Rhode Island’s New Child Sexual Abuse Law (H-7200A/S-2616A) Affects Survivors
Governor Dan McKee signed legislation amending the statute of limitations for child victim claims of sexual abuse and creating a two-year window for victims to bring otherwise time-barred claims against institutions and supervisors accused of enabling or covering up sexual abuse. He signed the law on June 11, 2026, and the new law takes effect on July 1, 2026.
This matters enormously for survivors of Brother Raphael Edes and others who were abused at St. Raphael Academy. Many of those survivors are adults who have lived with this trauma for decades. Under the previous legal framework, their time to file a civil lawsuit may have already expired. The new law establishes a two-year civil “revival window” that opens from July 1, 2026 to June 30, 2028. During this 24-month period, survivors can file civil suits even if the statute of limitations on their claims had previously expired.
The law (H-7200A/S-2616A) also amends the statute of limitations going forward, giving future survivors more time to come forward after they reach adulthood. Survivors now have 35 years from the date of the abuse, or 7 years from the time they first connected their injury to the abuse, whichever is later. The clock does not start running until a survivor turns 18.
The revival window applies specifically to claims against institutions and supervisors who enabled or covered up abuse. This is a direct response to a 2023 Rhode Island Supreme Court ruling that had limited the reach of an earlier 2019 law. In 2023, the Rhode Island Supreme Court ruled that the 2019 law only applied to suits against individual perpetrators, not the institutions or supervisors who enabled them. The 2026 law closes that gap. If you believe your claim against the Diocese of Providence, the Christian Brothers, or St. Raphael Academy may have been time-barred, the window that opened on July 1, 2026 may change everything.
Why Institutions Like the Christian Brothers and the Diocese May Be Held Liable
Civil liability for sexual abuse does not stop with the individual who committed the harm. Rhode Island law recognizes that institutions and supervisors who knew about abuse, failed to act, or actively concealed it can be held accountable in civil court. The 2026 revival window under H-7200A/S-2616A specifically targets this category of defendant: institutions and supervisors accused of enabling or covering up sexual abuse.
In the case of Brother Raphael Edes, the record shows that the Diocese of Providence received a formal complaint in 1994 and produced only a memo acknowledging receipt. The Congregation of Christian Brothers had two additional credible allegations on file by 2018. Despite all of this, Edes was not removed from the credibly accused list, and there is no documented evidence that either institution referred the matter to law enforcement at the time.
The enactment of the new law comes after the release of a report in March by Attorney General Peter F. Neronha accusing the Catholic Diocese of Providence of a “well-worn pattern” of failing to remove dozens of priests accused of child sexual abuse and keeping the abuse secret over decades. That pattern is not an abstraction. It has real names attached to it, and Edes is one of them.
Rhode Island civil law allows survivors to pursue claims for damages including physical harm, emotional harm, and the long-term consequences of abuse. Working with an experienced sexual abuse lawyer can help you understand which institutions may bear responsibility in your specific situation, and how the 2026 revival window applies to your claim. The Congregation of Christian Brothers, as the religious order that employed and supervised Edes, is a potential defendant separate from the Diocese itself.
What Survivors of Brother Raphael Edes Should Do Before the Window Closes
The two-year revival window runs from July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2028. That may sound like a long time, but building a civil case takes time, and the window is not indefinitely open. All time-barred claims must be filed by June 30, 2028, or they may be forever barred. Waiting carries real risk.
If you were a student at St. Raphael Academy in Pawtucket and were abused by Brother Raphael Edes, or if you witnessed or reported abuse that was ignored, reaching out to a lawyer is the right first step. You do not need to have all the details figured out before making that call. A compassionate legal team will listen first and ask only what is needed to understand your situation.
Rhode Island also allows survivors to file civil lawsuits under a pseudonym in certain circumstances. This means you may be able to pursue accountability without your name appearing in public court records. If confidentiality is a concern, ask about this option when you speak with an attorney. The ability to file anonymously has allowed many survivors to come forward who would otherwise have stayed silent.
Sommers Schwartz represents survivors of sexual assault and sexual abuse across Rhode Island and multiple states. Our attorneys understand the emotional weight of these cases and approach every client with the seriousness and care that survivors deserve. If you or someone you love was harmed at St. Raphael Academy, or by any member of the Diocese of Providence’s credibly accused clergy, we want to hear from you. Contact a sexual assault attorney at Sommers Schwartz today for a confidential, no-obligation conversation about your legal options.
FAQs About Brother Raphael Edes and Rhode Island Clergy Abuse Claims
Is Brother Raphael Edes still alive?
Yes. As of the Rhode Island Attorney General’s March 2026 report, Brother Raphael Edes is retired and still living. He is noted in the report as the only living member of the 20 credibly accused clergy identified by the Attorney General who were not placed on the Diocese of Providence’s own Credibly Accused List. In 2025, Rhode Island State Police interviewed him as part of the investigation.
Why wasn’t Edes on the Diocese of Providence’s Credibly Accused List?
That is a question the Rhode Island Attorney General’s report raises directly. The Diocese’s Review Board discussed Edes in February 2019, before publishing its Credibly Accused List, but no documented determination was made, and Edes was excluded from the list. The Attorney General’s report identified him as credibly accused based on at least three separate allegations deemed credible by either the Diocese or the Christian Brothers. The report treats this omission as part of a broader pattern of institutional failure within the Diocese of Providence.
Can I still sue if the abuse happened in the 1980s or early 1990s?
Possibly, yes. Rhode Island’s new law (H-7200A/S-2616A), signed by Governor Dan McKee on June 11, 2026 and effective July 1, 2026, creates a two-year revival window for survivors to bring otherwise time-barred civil claims against institutions and supervisors accused of enabling or covering up sexual abuse. This window is open from July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2028. If your claim was previously time-barred, this law may reopen the door. Speaking with an attorney is the best way to find out whether your specific situation qualifies.
Who can be sued besides the individual abuser?
Rhode Island’s 2026 revival window specifically targets institutions and supervisors accused of enabling or covering up abuse. In cases involving Brother Raphael Edes, potential defendants could include the Congregation of Christian Brothers, as his religious order, and the Diocese of Providence, which received complaints and failed to act. Your attorney will evaluate the specific facts of your case to identify which parties may bear legal responsibility for the harm you suffered.
What if I am not ready to talk about what happened?
That is completely understandable. Trauma does not follow a timeline, and there is no requirement that you have everything sorted out before reaching out to a lawyer. A good legal team will meet you where you are. The initial consultation is confidential, and you are in control of how much you share and when. What matters most right now is that the two-year revival window has a firm end date of June 30, 2028. Reaching out early gives you and your attorney the most time to build the strongest possible case on your behalf.
More Resources About Clergy Abuse
- Diocese of Providence Clergy Abuse
- Father John Abruzzese
- Father Raymond Allard
- Father Argencourt
- Father Azzarone
- Father Barnes
- Father Battel
- Father Belhumeur
- Father Bordignon
- Father Dennis Brodeur
- Father Campbell
- Father Carpentier
- Father Cavanaugh
- Father Charland
- Father Corbesero
- Father Crafton
- Father D’Angelo
- Father DeAngelis
- Father Louis Demers
- Father Albert Desrosiers
- Father Paul Desrosiers
- Father Diogo
- Father Dolan
- Father Doran
- Father Dunn
- Father Dziob
- Father Feeney
- Father Oscar Ferland
- Father Ferry
- Father Fitzgerald
- Father Flanagan
- Father Gagnon
- Father Gillooly
- Father Gorton
- Father Guertin
- Father Holden
- Father James Jackson
- Father Edward Kelley
- Father Lacasse
- Father LaMountain
- Father Leboeuf
- Father Paul Henry Leech
- Father Lepire
- Father Lonardo
- Father Philip Magaldi
- Father Manu
- Father Normand Marcantonio
- Father Joseph McCra
- Father McIntyre
- Father Meehan
- Father Meglio
- Father Menard
- Father Micarelli
- Father O’Connell
- Father J.F. O’Neil
- Father W. O’Neill
- Father Powers
- Father Rafferty
- Father Raiche
- Father Reynolds
- Father Rocha
- Father Sadowski
- Father Santagata
- Father Francis Santilli
- Father John Scagnelli
- Father Smyth
- Father Tanguay
- Father Tedeschi
- Father Tormey
- Father Tousignant
- Father Turillo
- Father Ventre
We fight hard. And we win.
News & Case Alerts
Read related articles and learn about recently filed cases.
Working with Tad Roumayah
I can’t say enough good things about working with Tad Roumayah. From our very first conversation, he was attentive, straightforward, and genuinely invested in getting the best outcome for my case. He took the time to explain everything clearly, answered my questions (even the ones I asked more than once)…
Praise for Alexis Amy and Tad Roumayah
I am very happy with the settlement Sommers Schwartz obtained for me in my age and disability discrimination case.Tad Roumayah and Alexis Amy explained every step of the process and answered all my questions along the way.I highly recommend this law firm!
I Cannot Say Enough Good Things About This Law Firm and My Attorney, Matthew G. Curtis.
I cannot say enough good things about this law firm and my attorney, Matthew G. Curtis. From the very beginning, their professionalism, communication, and attention to detail stood out immediately. They kept me informed throughout the entire process, answered my questions promptly, and always made me feel like a priority…
From a Wayne State Medical School Student About Judy Susskind
Law & Medicine was truly one of my favorite rotations – seeing a trial and learning from you was a privilege. Medical students are so lucky to have such an incredible preceptor for this experience. Your firm, colleagues, and clients are lucky to have you. (From a Wayne State University…
Praise for Tad Roumayah and Nathan Robbins
Tad Roumayah and Nathan Robbins are very professional and knowledgeable. They took charge from beginning to end with my employment case. I highly recommend them.
A Recommendation for Matthew Curtis and David Black
I highly recommend Matthew Curtis and David Black. They represented me in a legal malpractice case and did an outstanding job. They were very responsive, organized, efficient, and easy to work with throughout the entire process. What I appreciated most was that they were willing to take my case when…
Thank You, Jason Thompson
I just wanted to say thank you, Jason. The amount of work that you have done is astronomical, and it hasn’t gone unnoticed. We’ve always felt that you do what you say, take responsibility for your actions, even when you’re wrong, and that your word is your bond. (We found…
Heartfelt Thanks to Judy Susskind
Judy, I wanted to inform you that my mother passed away last night after losing a painful battle. She wanted me to specifically contact you and thank you for what you did for her. You took a chance and stood by her when no one else would, and you helped…
Our Clients Say It Best






