Father James Jackson was a Catholic priest assigned to St. Mary’s Church in Providence, Rhode Island, who was arrested in October 2021 on charges related to child sexual abuse material. His case drew national attention and ultimately led to a federal guilty plea. If you or someone you love was harmed by Father Jackson, or by any member of the clergy who abused a position of trust, you deserve to know your rights. Rhode Island law has changed significantly in 2026, and the window for seeking civil justice is now open. The attorneys at Sommers Schwartz are here to help you understand your options with compassion, honesty, and no pressure.
Table of Contents
- Who Is Father James Jackson and What Did He Do in Rhode Island?
- Father James Jackson’s Federal Guilty Plea and What It Means for Survivors
- How the Rhode Island Attorney General’s Report Connected Father Jackson to the Diocese of Providence
- Rhode Island’s New Child Sexual Abuse Law Opens a Two-Year Window for Survivors
- How Sommers Schwartz Can Help Survivors of Father James Jackson and Diocese of Providence Clergy Abuse
- FAQs About Father James Jackson and Rhode Island Clergy Abuse Claims
Who Is Father James Jackson and What Did He Do in Rhode Island?
Father James Jackson was a priest of the Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter (FSSP) and pastor of St. Mary’s Church in Providence, Rhode Island. According to records from the Rhode Island Attorney General’s Office, he was born on June 3, 1955, ordained on May 18, 1985, and his partial assignment history in Rhode Island shows he served at St. Mary Church, Providence, from August to October 2021, before being suspended on October 31, 2021, and resigning on November 18, 2021.
The arrest stemmed from an investigation by the Rhode Island State Police Computer Crimes Units/Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) Task Force, which discovered that the internet connection at the rectory at St. Mary’s Church was being used to share child sexual abuse material.
Father James W. Jackson, 66, arrested on October 30, 2021, by the Rhode Island State Police Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) Task Force on state child pornography charges, later made an initial appearance in U.S. District Court on a federal criminal complaint charging him with distributing child pornography, and possessing and accessing with intent to view child pornography.
A court-authorized search of a computer and digital device located in a church rectory bedroom utilized by Father Jackson was found to contain images and videos of child sexual abuse, including multiple images involving prepubescent females, some of which involved acts of bestiality. These findings were deeply disturbing, and survivors and their families who were connected to St. Mary’s Parish had every reason to feel shaken and betrayed.
The Rhode Island Attorney General’s investigation into the Diocese of Providence directly resulted in Father Jackson being added to the Diocese’s Credibly Accused Clergy list. According to the Attorney General’s report, the Diocese’s original list failed to include Father Jackson, and his name was only added as a direct result of the state investigation. That fact alone raises serious questions about institutional accountability.
Father James Jackson’s Federal Guilty Plea and What It Means for Survivors
Father James W. Jackson pleaded guilty in federal court in Rhode Island to a charge of receipt of child pornography, admitting to a federal judge that he downloaded files of child sexual abuse using a peer-to-peer file-sharing network. A criminal conviction, or a guilty plea, does not automatically resolve the civil claims of people who were harmed. Criminal cases are brought by the government. Civil lawsuits are brought by survivors themselves, and they serve a different purpose: holding the abuser and any enabling institution financially accountable.
In June 2022, members of the Kansas ICAC identified a computer sharing child pornography via a peer-to-peer network. Through investigation, the IP address was traced to the residence in Kansas where Father Jackson was staying. Acting on a court-authorized search warrant, members of the Kansas ICAC seized a portable computer and an external hard drive from Jackson’s bedroom, and an analysis of the storage device revealed evidence that numerous files with names indicative of child sexual abuse material had been deleted.
The fact that Jackson allegedly continued this conduct even after his initial arrest, while under court supervision, speaks to the severity of the harm and the failure of oversight systems meant to protect children. For survivors who were exposed to Father Jackson in any context during his ministry, whether in Rhode Island or elsewhere, the pattern of behavior documented by federal investigators is relevant to any civil claim you may have.
A sexual assault attorney who handles clergy abuse cases can review the specific facts of your situation and explain what legal options may be available to you. You do not need to have been named in a criminal case to pursue a civil claim. What happened to you matters, and your story deserves to be heard.
How the Rhode Island Attorney General’s Report Connected Father Jackson to the Diocese of Providence
The Rhode Island Attorney General’s Office released a comprehensive report on the Diocese of Providence in March 2026. Its enactment of new legislation came after the release of that report by Attorney General Peter F. Neronha, which accused the Catholic Diocese of Providence of a “well-worn pattern” of failing to remove dozens of priests accused of child sexual abuse and keeping the abuse secret over decades. The report identified 75 clergy members who sexually abused more than 300 children since 1950.
Father Jackson was one of four priests added to the Diocese’s Credibly Accused Clergy list as a direct result of the Attorney General’s investigation. The other three were Father Edward Kelley, Father Francis Santilli, and Father Joseph McCra. The fact that these names were missing from the Diocese’s original list raises troubling questions about what else may have been omitted or concealed.
According to the Diocese of Providence, “Father Jackson has no status with the diocese. He is not now and has never been a priest of the Diocese of Providence. He is/was a priest of the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Peter (FSSP).” That distinction matters legally. It raises questions about which institution bears responsibility, and whether the Diocese, the FSSP, or both had a duty to protect the people in their care. Survivors exploring a civil claim need an attorney who understands how institutional liability works across different Catholic organizations.
The Rhode Island Attorney General’s report documented patterns of reassignment and concealment across the Diocese of Providence that parallel what happened in Father Jackson’s case. The report documented more than 300 survivors of abuse within the Diocese of Providence, identified 75 clergy members with credible allegations of sexual misconduct dating back to 1950, and outlined how the Diocese allegedly concealed that abuse for decades. If you were harmed and felt that no one in authority was listening, that experience reflects a documented pattern, not an isolated failure.
Rhode Island’s New Child Sexual Abuse Law Opens a Two-Year Window for Survivors
On June 11, 2026, Rhode Island Governor Dan McKee signed legislation giving survivors of childhood sexual abuse a new opportunity to pursue civil claims that would otherwise be permanently closed. This law, known as H-7200a/S-2616a, is one of the most important legal developments for abuse survivors in Rhode Island’s history.
The law amends the statute of limitations for claims of sexual abuse of a child and creates a two-year window for victims to bring otherwise time-barred claims against institutions and supervisors accused of enabling or covering up sexual abuse. That means survivors can now bring claims not just against the person who harmed them, but against the organizations that looked the other way.
The new law establishes a two-year civil “revival window” that opens from July 1, 2026 to June 30, 2028. During this 24-month period, survivors can file civil suits even if the statute of limitations on their claims had previously expired. If you believed your time had passed, this law may have changed that. The window is real, it is open now, and it will close permanently on June 30, 2028.
In 2023, the Rhode Island Supreme Court ruled that the 2019 law only applied to suits against individual perpetrators, not the institutions or supervisors who enabled them. The new 2026 law directly addresses that gap. Institutions and supervisors who covered up abuse can now be held accountable in civil court by survivors whose claims were previously time-barred.
If you were abused by Father Jackson, or by any clergy member connected to the Diocese of Providence or the FSSP, and you have never filed a civil claim, this two-year window may be your last opportunity. Speaking with a sexual abuse lawyer now, rather than waiting, gives you the best chance to preserve your rights before the window closes.
How Sommers Schwartz Can Help Survivors of Father James Jackson and Diocese of Providence Clergy Abuse
Survivors of clergy abuse often carry their pain silently for years, sometimes decades. If you were harmed by Father James Jackson, or by any other priest or religious figure in Rhode Island, what happened to you was not your fault. You did nothing wrong. The responsibility lies entirely with the person who abused you and with any institution that failed to protect you.
Sommers Schwartz is a multi-state law firm with attorneys representing sexual assault and sexual abuse survivors in Rhode Island. Our attorneys understand the Diocese of Providence’s history, the FSSP’s structure, and the specific legal claims that apply under Rhode Island law. We know how these institutions operate, and we know how to build a case that holds them accountable. We handle these cases with care, discretion, and a deep respect for the courage it takes to come forward.
Filing a civil claim does not require you to relive your experience publicly. Rhode Island courts allow survivors to file as Jane Doe or John Doe in many circumstances, protecting your identity while still pursuing justice. Our attorneys can walk you through every step, from the initial consultation to the resolution of your case, so you always know what to expect.
The 2026 lookback window created by H-7200a/S-2616a is open now, but it will not stay open forever. All time-barred claims must be filed by June 30, 2028, or they may be forever barred. If you have questions about whether your claim qualifies, a sexual assault lawyer at Sommers Schwartz can review your situation confidentially and help you understand your options. There is no obligation, and you will never be pressured. We are here when you are ready.
FAQs About Father James Jackson and Rhode Island Clergy Abuse Claims
Was Father James Jackson ever convicted of a crime related to child sexual abuse?
Yes. Father James W. Jackson pleaded guilty in federal court in Rhode Island to a charge of receipt of child pornography. He admitted to downloading files of child sexual abuse material using a peer-to-peer file-sharing network. A criminal guilty plea is separate from a civil lawsuit. Survivors who were harmed by Father Jackson, or who were exposed to his conduct in any way, may still have the right to pursue a civil claim for damages against him and any institution that bears responsibility.
Can I file a civil lawsuit against the FSSP or the Diocese of Providence related to Father Jackson?
Potentially, yes. Rhode Island’s new law, H-7200a/S-2616a, effective July 1, 2026, creates a two-year window for survivors to bring civil claims against institutions and supervisors accused of enabling or covering up sexual abuse. Whether the FSSP, the Diocese of Providence, or both bear civil liability depends on the specific facts of your situation. An attorney can evaluate those facts and advise you on which institutions may be responsible under Rhode Island law.
What if I was connected to Father Jackson’s ministry in another state before he came to Rhode Island?
Each state has its own laws governing civil claims for childhood sexual abuse. Father Jackson served in Colorado for approximately 15 years before his assignment in Rhode Island. If the abuse occurred in another state, different statutes of limitations and lookback window laws may apply. Sommers Schwartz is a multi-state law firm and can help you identify which state’s law applies to your situation and whether a viable claim exists. Contacting an attorney as soon as possible is important, because legal deadlines vary.
I was not a child when I had contact with Father Jackson. Can I still file a claim?
Rhode Island’s new lookback window law specifically addresses claims related to sexual abuse of a child, meaning the abuse must have occurred when you were a minor. However, if you were an adult when harmed, you may still have civil claims under other Rhode Island statutes, depending on the circumstances. Rhode Island law also recognizes claims for sexual assault committed against adults. The best way to understand whether you have a viable claim is to speak with an attorney who handles sexual abuse cases in Rhode Island.
How long do I have to file a claim under Rhode Island’s new 2026 lookback window?
The two-year revival window created by H-7200a/S-2616a opened on July 1, 2026, and closes on June 30, 2028. During that period, survivors can file civil suits against institutions and supervisors for claims that were previously time-barred. Once the window closes, those claims may be permanently lost. If you are unsure whether your claim qualifies, do not wait. Contact Sommers Schwartz today for a confidential, no-pressure consultation. Acting sooner gives your attorney the most time to build the strongest possible case on your behalf.
More Resources About Clergy Abuse
- Diocese of Providence Clergy Abuse
- Father John Abruzzese
- Father Raymond Allard
- Father Argencourt
- Father Azzarone
- Father Barnes
- Father Battel
- Father Belhumeur
- Father Bordignon
- Father Dennis Brodeur
- Father Campbell
- Father Carpentier
- Father Cavanaugh
- Father Charland
- Father Corbesero
- Father Crafton
- Father D’Angelo
- Father DeAngelis
- Father Louis Demers
- Father Albert Desrosiers
- Father Paul Desrosiers
- Father Diogo
- Father Dolan
- Father Doran
- Father Dunn
- Father Dziob
- Father Edes
- Father Feeney
- Father Oscar Ferland
- Father Ferry
- Father Fitzgerald
- Father Flanagan
- Father Gagnon
- Father Gillooly
- Father Gorton
- Father Guertin
- Father Holden
- Father Edward Kelley
- Father Lacasse
- Father LaMountain
- Father Leboeuf
- Father Paul Henry Leech
- Father Lepire
- Father Lonardo
- Father Philip Magaldi
- Father Manu
- Father Normand Marcantonio
- Father Joseph McCra
- Father McIntyre
- Father Meehan
- Father Meglio
- Father Menard
- Father Micarelli
- Father O’Connell
- Father J.F. O’Neil
- Father W. O’Neill
- Father Powers
- Father Rafferty
- Father Raiche
- Father Reynolds
- Father Rocha
- Father Sadowski
- Father Santagata
- Father Francis Santilli
- Father John Scagnelli
- Father Smyth
- Father Tanguay
- Father Tedeschi
- Father Tormey
- Father Tousignant
- Father Turillo
- Father Ventre
We fight hard. And we win.
News & Case Alerts
Read related articles and learn about recently filed cases.
A Client’s Praise for Dina Zalewski
My experience with Dina Zalewski and the Sommers Schwartz team was nothing short of incredible. The way that they showed genuine concern throughout this ordeal made me feel increasingly confident. I highly recommend Dina and her team for any of your legal pursuits.
Working with Tad Roumayah
I can’t say enough good things about working with Tad Roumayah. From our very first conversation, he was attentive, straightforward, and genuinely invested in getting the best outcome for my case. He took the time to explain everything clearly, answered my questions (even the ones I asked more than once)…
Praise for Alexis Amy and Tad Roumayah
I am very happy with the settlement Sommers Schwartz obtained for me in my age and disability discrimination case.Tad Roumayah and Alexis Amy explained every step of the process and answered all my questions along the way.I highly recommend this law firm!
I Cannot Say Enough Good Things About This Law Firm and My Attorney, Matthew G. Curtis.
I cannot say enough good things about this law firm and my attorney, Matthew G. Curtis. From the very beginning, their professionalism, communication, and attention to detail stood out immediately. They kept me informed throughout the entire process, answered my questions promptly, and always made me feel like a priority…
From a Wayne State Medical School Student About Judy Susskind
Law & Medicine was truly one of my favorite rotations – seeing a trial and learning from you was a privilege. Medical students are so lucky to have such an incredible preceptor for this experience. Your firm, colleagues, and clients are lucky to have you. (From a Wayne State University…
Praise for Tad Roumayah and Nathan Robbins
Tad Roumayah and Nathan Robbins are very professional and knowledgeable. They took charge from beginning to end with my employment case. I highly recommend them.
A Recommendation for Matthew Curtis and David Black
I highly recommend Matthew Curtis and David Black. They represented me in a legal malpractice case and did an outstanding job. They were very responsive, organized, efficient, and easy to work with throughout the entire process. What I appreciated most was that they were willing to take my case when…
Thank You, Jason Thompson
I just wanted to say thank you, Jason. The amount of work that you have done is astronomical, and it hasn’t gone unnoticed. We’ve always felt that you do what you say, take responsibility for your actions, even when you’re wrong, and that your word is your bond. (We found…
Our Clients Say It Best






