Sommers Schwartz is a powerhouse litigation firm that has recovered more than one billion dollars for our clients. When your future is on the line, our team will fight for you.

Clients say it best

I couldn’t have asked for better representation and counsel...

Attorney
Referrals

We can tackle some of the most complex matters in the litigation world.

Results

Year after year, our team delivers unmatched results for our clients.

Father Hugh Rafferty was a Roman Catholic priest ordained by the Diocese of Providence in 1964. He served at parishes in Rhode Island before his ministry ended, and he was later named on the Diocese of Providence’s credibly accused clergy list. According to the Rhode Island Attorney General’s 2026 report on child sexual abuse in the Diocese of Providence, a woman reported in 1995 that Father Rafferty raped her in his bedroom at the rectory of St. Matthew Parish in Cranston when she was 13 years old, during the mid-1960s. If you were harmed by Father Rafferty, or by any other clergy member in Rhode Island, you are not alone, and what happened to you was not your fault. Rhode Island’s new child sexual abuse law may give you a path to justice that you did not have before.

Table of Contents

Who Was Father Hugh Rafferty and What Are the Allegations Against Him?

Father Hugh Rafferty was born on March 21, 1933, and ordained into the Diocese of Providence on June 4, 1964. According to the Rhode Island Attorney General’s Office credibly accused clergy list, his known Rhode Island assignments included St. Matthew Church in Cranston from 1964 to 1966, and St. Leo the Great Church in Pawtucket from 1966 to 1967. He was removed from ministry on November 1, 1974, and was laicized by Pope Paul VI in December 1976. He died on January 11, 2001.

The Attorney General’s 2026 report on child sexual abuse in the Diocese of Providence contains a deeply troubling account connected to Rafferty. The report states that in 1995, the pastor of St. Gregory the Great Parish in Warwick informed the Diocese’s Office of Education and Compliance that a woman reported Father Rafferty raped her in his bedroom at the St. Matthew Parish rectory in Cranston when she was 13 years old, during the mid-1960s. At the time of that report, Rafferty had already been laicized.

Rafferty was also named on the Diocese of Providence’s credibly accused clergy list, which the Diocese first published in July 2019. He was named on the Diocese’s July 2019 list, with allegations received after his death. He was also included on the Diocese of Rockville Centre’s list of accused clergy in March 2021. The allegations against Rafferty span more than one diocese, which speaks to a pattern that the Rhode Island Attorney General’s investigation brought into sharp focus.

The fact that a survivor came forward in 1995 to report abuse that occurred in the 1960s is not unusual. Survivors of childhood sexual abuse often carry their trauma for decades before they feel safe enough to speak. That courage deserves to be honored, not questioned. If you experienced abuse by Father Rafferty, your experience matters and your voice matters.

How the Diocese of Providence Responded to the Rafferty Allegation

The Rhode Island Attorney General’s 2026 report does not describe any meaningful institutional response to the 1995 report about Father Rafferty. The allegation was received by the Diocese’s compliance office, but because Rafferty had already been laicized years earlier, the Diocese’s response is not documented in the report as involving law enforcement notification or a formal investigation.

This pattern of delayed or inadequate response is central to the Attorney General’s broader findings. The Attorney General’s report accused the Catholic Diocese of Providence of a “well-worn pattern” of failing to remove dozens of priests accused of child sexual abuse and keeping the abuse secret over decades. The report identified 75 clergy members who sexually abused more than 300 children since 1950.

The Diocese’s credibly accused clergy list, while a step toward transparency, has also drawn criticism for what it leaves out. The Attorney General’s report noted that for most credibly accused priests, the list states only that each priest was “removed from ministry” on a given date, without explaining what that phrase actually means or what steps, if any, were taken to protect children. That kind of institutional opacity is exactly what Rhode Island’s new child sexual abuse law is designed to address.

Survivors who were harmed by clergy like Father Rafferty, and who believe the Diocese or other supervisors knew about the abuse and failed to act, may now have legal options they did not have before. A sexual abuse lawyer with experience in Diocese of Providence clergy cases can help you understand whether your claim qualifies under Rhode Island’s new law.

Rhode Island’s 2026 Child Sexual Abuse Law and What It Means for Survivors

Rhode Island’s new child sexual abuse law, known as H-7200A/S-2616A, is now in effect. On June 11, 2026, Rhode Island Governor Dan McKee signed legislation giving survivors of childhood sexual abuse a new opportunity to pursue civil claims that would otherwise be permanently closed. The new law took effect on July 1, 2026.

The law amends the statute of limitations for claims of sexual abuse of a child and creates a two-year window for victims to bring otherwise time-barred claims against institutions and supervisors accused of enabling or covering up sexual abuse. This is a critical development for survivors whose claims were previously blocked because too much time had passed.

The new law establishes a two-year civil “revival window” that runs from July 1, 2026, to June 30, 2028. During this 24-month period, survivors can file civil suits even if the statute of limitations on their claims had previously expired. For someone who was abused by Father Rafferty at St. Matthew Church in Cranston in the 1960s, this window is significant. It means that a claim that was previously time-barred against the Diocese or supervisors who may have known about the abuse can now potentially be filed.

The law also addresses the gap created by a 2023 Rhode Island Supreme Court ruling. In 2019, the General Assembly extended the statute of limitations and gave previously time-barred survivors an opportunity to sue, but in 2023, the Rhode Island Supreme Court ruled that the 2019 law only applied to suits against individual perpetrators, not the institutions or supervisors who enabled them. The new 2026 law directly corrects that problem. It targets institutional accountability, meaning the Diocese of Providence and other supervisory bodies can now be sued during the revival window for their role in enabling or concealing abuse.

All time-barred claims must be filed by June 30, 2028, or they may be forever barred. This deadline is real. If you believe you have a claim, the time to act is now.

Who Can File a Claim Under Rhode Island’s Revival Window?

Rhode Island’s revival window is open to survivors of childhood sexual abuse who were previously unable to file a civil claim because the statute of limitations had run out. The window applies broadly. It applies to survivors of sexual abuse in any institutional setting, including churches, schools, youth programs, athletic organizations, and anywhere else an institution failed to protect a child in its care.

For survivors connected to Father Rafferty specifically, the question is whether the Diocese of Providence or other supervisory figures knew about the abuse, or should have known, and failed to act. If the answer is yes, a civil claim against those institutions may be possible during the revival window. You do not need a criminal conviction, and you do not need to have reported the abuse at the time it happened. Many survivors never told anyone for years, and that is completely understandable.

Survivors who were abused as children now have 35 years from the date of the abuse, or 7 years from the time they first connected their injury to the abuse, whichever is later. The clock does not start running until a survivor turns 18. These are the ongoing rules for future claims. The revival window is a separate, temporary opportunity for claims that are already time-barred under those rules.

The push for this law was directly connected to the Attorney General’s investigation. Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha released a comprehensive report on March 4, 2026, of a multi-year investigation into clergy sexual abuse within the Diocese of Providence. The report identified approximately 75 clergy members with credible allegations involving more than 300 minor children and described patterns in which accused clergy were reassigned and allegations were inconsistently reported to authorities.

If you were abused by Father Rafferty or another credibly accused priest in the Diocese of Providence, speaking with a sexual assault lawyer now, before the window closes, is the most important step you can take.

Why Institutional Accountability Matters in the Rafferty Case

Father Rafferty’s case is not just about one priest. It is about a system that allowed abuse to happen and, in some cases, failed to respond meaningfully when survivors came forward. The 1995 report to the Diocese about Rafferty came decades after the alleged abuse occurred. By then, he was already laicized. But the question survivors and their attorneys ask is this: what did the Diocese know, and when did it know it?

Holding institutions accountable is the core purpose of Rhode Island’s new revival window law. The 2023 Rhode Island Supreme Court decision had blocked survivors from suing the Diocese and other institutions for their role in enabling abuse. The 2026 law, H-7200A/S-2616A, reopens that door. The legislation applies to institutions the civil culpability that had already been applied to perpetrators. That is a meaningful shift in how Rhode Island law treats organizations that failed to protect children.

For survivors of Father Rafferty’s alleged abuse, this means the Diocese of Providence may now be a proper civil defendant during the revival window, if evidence supports that it knew about or concealed the abuse. That is a question a skilled sexual assault attorney can help you evaluate based on the specific facts of your situation.

You deserve answers. You deserve accountability. And you deserve to have someone in your corner who understands both the law and the weight of what you have carried. The attorneys at Sommers Schwartz represent survivors of clergy sexual abuse in Rhode Island and are ready to listen. Reaching out does not commit you to anything. It simply starts a conversation that could change your life.

FAQs About Father Rafferty and Rhode Island Clergy Abuse Claims

Was Father Hugh Rafferty officially listed as a credibly accused priest by the Diocese of Providence?

Yes. Father Hugh Rafferty was included on the Diocese of Providence’s credibly accused clergy list, which was first published in July 2019. He was removed from ministry on November 1, 1974, and was laicized by Pope Paul VI in December 1976. He died on January 11, 2001. Allegations against him were received after his death. He was also named on the Diocese of Rockville Centre’s credibly accused list in March 2021.

What does the Rhode Island Attorney General’s 2026 report say about Father Rafferty?

The Rhode Island Attorney General’s 2026 report on child sexual abuse in the Diocese of Providence includes an account of a woman who reported in 1995 that Father Rafferty raped her in his bedroom at the St. Matthew Parish rectory in Cranston when she was 13 years old, during the mid-1960s. The report documents this as part of a broader pattern of abuse and institutional failure within the Diocese.

Can I still file a lawsuit related to Father Rafferty’s alleged abuse even though he is deceased?

Father Rafferty died in 2001, which means a civil lawsuit cannot be filed against him personally. However, Rhode Island’s new child sexual abuse law, H-7200A/S-2616A, which took effect July 1, 2026, creates a two-year revival window allowing survivors to file otherwise time-barred claims against institutions and supervisors accused of enabling or covering up abuse. This means the Diocese of Providence may be a proper defendant if evidence supports institutional knowledge or concealment. The window runs through June 30, 2028.

What is the deadline to file a claim under Rhode Island’s new revival window?

The revival window created by H-7200A/S-2616A opened on July 1, 2026, and closes on June 30, 2028. Any time-barred claims that are not filed before that date may be permanently barred. If you believe you have a claim connected to Father Rafferty or any other credibly accused clergy member in Rhode Island, you should speak with an attorney as soon as possible to avoid missing this deadline.

How do I know if my experience qualifies for a civil claim under Rhode Island’s new law?

Every survivor’s situation is different, and whether your claim qualifies depends on the specific facts, including when the abuse occurred, where it happened, and what the institution knew or should have known. The attorneys at Sommers Schwartz offer confidential consultations for survivors of clergy sexual abuse in Rhode Island. Speaking with an attorney does not obligate you to file a lawsuit. It simply gives you the information you need to make an informed decision about your options during the revival window.

More Resources About Clergy Abuse

A Trusted Authority

Our attorneys have been featured on local and national media outlets, including:

Sommers Schwartz has appeared in CNN, Today Show, ClickOnDetroit, NBC News, and ABC

Working with Tad Roumayah

I can’t say enough good things about working with Tad Roumayah. From our very first conversation, he was attentive, straightforward, and genuinely invested in getting the best outcome for my case. He took the time to explain everything clearly, answered my questions (even the ones I asked more than once)…

Praise for Alexis Amy and Tad Roumayah

I am very happy with the settlement Sommers Schwartz obtained for me in my age and disability discrimination case.Tad Roumayah and Alexis Amy explained every step of the process and answered all my questions along the way.I highly recommend this law firm!

I Cannot Say Enough Good Things About This Law Firm and My Attorney, Matthew G. Curtis.

I cannot say enough good things about this law firm and my attorney, Matthew G. Curtis. From the very beginning, their professionalism, communication, and attention to detail stood out immediately. They kept me informed throughout the entire process, answered my questions promptly, and always made me feel like a priority…

From a Wayne State Medical School Student About Judy Susskind

Law & Medicine was truly one of my favorite rotations – seeing a trial and learning from you was a privilege. Medical students are so lucky to have such an incredible preceptor for this experience. Your firm, colleagues, and clients are lucky to have you. (From a Wayne State University…

Praise for Tad Roumayah and Nathan Robbins

Tad Roumayah and Nathan Robbins are very professional and knowledgeable. They took charge from beginning to end with my employment case. I highly recommend them.

A Recommendation for Matthew Curtis and David Black

I highly recommend Matthew Curtis and David Black. They represented me in a legal malpractice case and did an outstanding job. They were very responsive, organized, efficient, and easy to work with throughout the entire process. What I appreciated most was that they were willing to take my case when…

Thank You, Jason Thompson

I just wanted to say thank you, Jason. The amount of work that you have done is astronomical, and it hasn’t gone unnoticed. We’ve always felt that you do what you say, take responsibility for your actions, even when you’re wrong, and that your word is your bond. (We found…

Heartfelt Thanks to Judy Susskind

Judy, I wanted to inform you that my mother passed away last night after losing a painful battle. She wanted me to specifically contact you and thank you for what you did for her. You took a chance and stood by her when no one else would, and you helped…

Our Clients Say It Best

Google Reviews
Over 200 5-star reviews on Google