Father John Tormey is listed by the Roman Catholic Diocese of Providence as a priest credibly accused of sexual misconduct involving a minor. He was named publicly as accused by the Diocese on its list in July 2019. For survivors who may have had any contact with him during his years in ministry, understanding who he was, what the Diocese knew, and what legal options exist today is important. Rhode Island’s laws have changed significantly in 2026, and those changes may directly affect your ability to seek justice.
Table of Contents
- Who Is Father John Tormey and What Did the Diocese Report?
- The Pattern of Reassignment Across the Diocese of Providence
- Rhode Island’s New Child Sexual Abuse Law Opens a Two-Year Window for Survivors
- What Survivors of Father Tormey’s Abuse May Be Able to Claim
- Why the Revival Window Matters and Why Timing Is Critical
- How Sommers Schwartz Helps Survivors of Clergy Sexual Abuse in Rhode Island
- FAQs About Father Tormey and Rhode Island Clergy Sexual Abuse Claims
Who Is Father John Tormey and What Did the Diocese Report?
Father John Tormey was ordained as a Catholic priest on June 3, 1967, and served within the Diocese of Providence until he resigned from ministry on March 2, 1979. According to records from the Rhode Island Attorney General’s Office, his assignment history included Our Lady of Fatima Hospital in Providence, St. Margaret Church in East Providence from 1967 to 1973, and St. Mary Academy Bay View in Providence from 1970 to 1973. He later served at Blessed Sacrament Church in Providence and at the House of Affirmation in Whitinsville, Massachusetts, before his assignments concluded.
Tormey told the New Bedford Standard-Times in 2019 that the complaint came from a teenage girl at St. Mary Bay View Academy in 1973, an all-girls Catholic school in East Providence. His record shows he went on sabbatical for several months afterward, and was later reassigned to another all-girls Catholic school, St. Xavier Academy in Providence. This pattern of reassignment, moving an accused priest to a new setting rather than removing him from ministry, is one that the Rhode Island Attorney General’s report identified as a recurring problem across the Diocese of Providence.
Tormey said that in 2002, the Diocese received an allegation about him, but never told him about it. The Diocese received a complaint about him in 2002, which led to him being included on the list in 2019, according to court records. Tormey denied the allegations and filed a defamation lawsuit against the Diocese and Bishop Thomas Tobin. Whether or not he is ultimately found liable in any civil proceeding, the fact that his name appears on the Diocese’s credibly accused list is meaningful to survivors who may be weighing their own legal options.
The Pattern of Reassignment Across the Diocese of Providence
Father Tormey’s assignment history fits a pattern that the Rhode Island Attorney General’s Office documented in its March 2026 report on child sexual abuse within the Diocese of Providence. The report identified approximately 75 clergy members with credible allegations involving more than 300 minor children and described patterns in which accused clergy were reassigned and allegations were inconsistently reported to authorities.
The Attorney General’s report found that bishops moved accused priests to new assignments rather than removing them from ministry. The report accused the Catholic Diocese of Providence of a “well-worn pattern” of failing to remove dozens of priests accused of child sexual abuse and keeping the abuse secret over decades, identifying 75 clergy members who sexually abused more than 300 children since 1950. Tormey’s post-complaint reassignment to another Catholic school is consistent with this documented institutional behavior.
This matters for survivors because civil claims can be brought not just against individual perpetrators, but also against institutions and supervisors who enabled or concealed abuse. The question of what the Diocese knew, when it knew it, and what it chose to do, sits at the center of many civil lawsuits filed by survivors across Rhode Island. If you were abused by a priest who served alongside Tormey, or at any of the same parishes or schools, those institutional decisions may be directly relevant to your case. A sexual abuse lawyer with experience in Diocese of Providence cases can help you understand whether the institution’s conduct strengthens your claim.
Rhode Island’s New Child Sexual Abuse Law Opens a Two-Year Window for Survivors
Rhode Island law changed in a significant way on June 11, 2026, when Governor Dan McKee signed H-7200a/S-2616a into law. The law amends the statute of limitations for claims of sexual abuse of a child and creates a two-year window for victims to bring otherwise time-barred claims against institutions and supervisors accused of enabling or covering up sexual abuse. The new law takes effect on July 1, 2026.
The new law establishes a two-year civil “revival window” that opens from July 1, 2026 to June 30, 2028. During this 24-month period, survivors can file civil suits even if the statute of limitations on their claims had previously expired. This is a real opportunity for survivors who believed their time to act had passed. The law specifically targets the institutions and supervisors who failed to protect children, not just the individual abusers.
The law also changes the rules going forward. For other survivors, the statute of limitations begins running when the survivor turns 18. Future claims must be filed by whichever date is later: either 35 years from the date of the abusive act (or age 53) or seven years from when the survivor first discovers or reasonably connects their adult injuries to the childhood abuse.
In 2023, the Rhode Island Supreme Court ruled that the 2019 law only applied to suits against individual perpetrators, not the institutions or supervisors who enabled them. H-7200a/S-2616a directly addresses that gap. It now gives survivors the ability to pursue the Diocese of Providence and other institutions within the revival window. The new law specifically targets institutions and organizations such as churches, schools, youth programs, healthcare facilities and sports leagues, as well as supervisors. If you were abused at any parish, school, or institution connected to Father Tormey’s ministry, this window may apply to you.
What Survivors of Father Tormey’s Abuse May Be Able to Claim
Civil sexual abuse claims in Rhode Island can cover a wide range of harm. Survivors may pursue compensation for physical injuries, emotional distress, psychological trauma, lost wages, and the cost of therapy and mental health treatment. These claims recognize that the damage from childhood sexual abuse extends far beyond the immediate event and often shapes a survivor’s entire adult life.
Under Rhode Island law, civil claims can be brought against the individual perpetrator and, critically, against the institutions that knew about abuse and failed to act. The Diocese of Providence’s own records show that a complaint about Father Tormey was received in 2002. If the Diocese had information about misconduct and did not take appropriate action to protect others, that institutional failure may support a civil claim against the Diocese itself.
Survivors who were abused at St. Margaret Church in East Providence, St. Mary Academy Bay View, Blessed Sacrament Church, or St. Xavier Academy in Providence during the years Father Tormey served there may have claims worth exploring. The same is true for anyone who had contact with him at Our Lady of Fatima Hospital in Providence. Speaking with a sexual assault lawyer who understands the Diocese of Providence’s history of institutional concealment is the right first step.
You do not need to have a police report, a prior complaint, or any documentation to begin a civil claim. Many survivors come forward with only their own memory and experience, and that is enough to start a conversation with an attorney. What happened to you was not your fault, and you deserve to have your story heard by someone who will take it seriously.
Why the Revival Window Matters and Why Timing Is Critical
The revival window created by H-7200a/S-2616a will not stay open indefinitely. All time-barred claims must be filed by June 30, 2028, or they may be forever barred. That is a firm deadline, and two years passes quickly, especially when you factor in the time needed to investigate a claim, gather records, and prepare a lawsuit.
Survivors who were abused decades ago and who assumed their legal options were gone should know that this law was written specifically for them. By temporarily suspending the statute of limitations for these claims, the legislation offers those who suffered trauma decades ago a chance to seek justice against a perpetrator and any other party that may have had some level of involvement in the claims, regardless of how much time has passed.
The push for this law came directly from the Attorney General’s findings. The push for this law was closely tied to a 284-page report released in March 2026 by Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha. The report documented more than 300 survivors of abuse within the Diocese of Providence and identified 75 clergy members with credible allegations of sexual misconduct dating back to 1950. It also outlined how the Diocese allegedly concealed that abuse for decades. Father Tormey’s name appears in those records.
Survivors who are considering filing a claim under the revival window should act now. Building a civil case takes time, and waiting until the final months of the window creates unnecessary risk. A qualified sexual assault attorney can evaluate your situation, explain your rights under H-7200a/S-2616a, and help you decide whether to move forward, with no pressure and no judgment.
How Sommers Schwartz Helps Survivors of Clergy Sexual Abuse in Rhode Island
Sommers Schwartz represents survivors of sexual abuse and assault across Rhode Island and multiple states. The attorneys at Sommers Schwartz understand that coming forward is one of the hardest decisions a survivor can make. They approach every case with respect, patience, and a genuine commitment to holding institutions accountable for the harm they caused or allowed to happen.
If you were abused by Father Tormey, or by any priest within the Diocese of Providence, Sommers Schwartz can help you understand your rights under Rhode Island’s new child sexual abuse law. The firm handles clergy abuse cases on a contingency fee basis, which means you pay nothing unless your case results in a recovery. There is no financial barrier to getting legal advice.
Survivors who are not ready to file a lawsuit but want to understand their options are welcome to reach out as well. A confidential consultation costs nothing and commits you to nothing. You can also file a civil lawsuit anonymously in Rhode Island, using a Jane Doe or John Doe designation, which protects your identity throughout the legal process. Sommers Schwartz will walk you through every option available to you and let you decide what feels right.
The revival window is open now. If you were harmed by Father Tormey or by the Diocese’s failure to protect you, please reach out to Sommers Schwartz today. You have been waiting long enough.
FAQs About Father Tormey and Rhode Island Clergy Sexual Abuse Claims
Is Father John Tormey still a priest in Rhode Island?
No. Father John Tormey resigned from ministry on March 2, 1979. He is no longer active in the priesthood. He was ordained in 1967 and served in several Diocese of Providence assignments before leaving. The Diocese of Providence placed his name on its list of credibly accused clergy in July 2019, following a complaint received by the Diocese in 2002.
Can I still file a civil lawsuit related to Father Tormey’s alleged abuse?
Yes, you may be able to file a civil lawsuit under Rhode Island’s new child sexual abuse law, H-7200a/S-2616a, signed by Governor Dan McKee on June 11, 2026, and effective July 1, 2026. The law creates a two-year revival window, running from July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2028, during which survivors can file otherwise time-barred civil claims against perpetrators, institutions, and supervisors accused of enabling or covering up abuse. Speaking with an attorney as soon as possible gives you the best chance of meeting this deadline.
Can I sue the Diocese of Providence, not just Father Tormey personally?
Yes. Rhode Island’s new law specifically allows survivors to bring civil claims against institutions and supervisors who enabled or covered up sexual abuse. If the Diocese of Providence had knowledge of misconduct and failed to act appropriately, that institutional conduct may support a separate civil claim against the Diocese itself. The Diocese received a complaint about Father Tormey in 2002, and its response, or lack of one, may be relevant to any civil case involving him.
What if I am not sure whether what happened to me qualifies as sexual abuse?
You do not need to have a legal definition in mind before reaching out to an attorney. Many survivors are uncertain about how to characterize what they experienced, especially when the abuse was committed by someone in a position of religious authority. A confidential consultation with Sommers Schwartz will help you understand whether your experience falls within the scope of a civil claim under Rhode Island law. There is no obligation and no cost to that conversation.
Will my identity be made public if I file a lawsuit?
Not necessarily. Rhode Island courts allow survivors to file civil lawsuits using a Jane Doe or John Doe designation, which keeps your name out of public records throughout the legal process. This option is available to survivors who are concerned about privacy or public exposure. Sommers Schwartz can explain how anonymous filing works and whether it is appropriate for your situation.
More Resources About Clergy Abuse
- Diocese of Providence Clergy Abuse
- Father John Abruzzese
- Father Raymond Allard
- Father Argencourt
- Father Azzarone
- Father Barnes
- Father Battel
- Father Belhumeur
- Father Bordignon
- Father Dennis Brodeur
- Father Campbell
- Father Carpentier
- Father Cavanaugh
- Father Charland
- Father Corbesero
- Father Crafton
- Father D’Angelo
- Father DeAngelis
- Father Louis Demers
- Father Albert Desrosiers
- Father Paul Desrosiers
- Father Diogo
- Father Dolan
- Father Doran
- Father Dunn
- Father Dziob
- Father Edes
- Father Feeney
- Father Oscar Ferland
- Father Ferry
- Father Fitzgerald
- Father Flanagan
- Father Gagnon
- Father Gillooly
- Father Gorton
- Father Guertin
- Father Holden
- Father James Jackson
- Father Edward Kelley
- Father Lacasse
- Father LaMountain
- Father Leboeuf
- Father Paul Henry Leech
- Father Lepire
- Father Lonardo
- Father Philip Magaldi
- Father Manu
- Father Normand Marcantonio
- Father Joseph McCra
- Father McIntyre
- Father Meehan
- Father Meglio
- Father Menard
- Father Micarelli
- Father O’Connell
- Father J.F. O’Neil
- Father W. O’Neill
- Father Powers
- Father Rafferty
- Father Raiche
- Father Reynolds
- Father Rocha
- Father Sadowski
- Father Santagata
- Father Francis Santilli
- Father John Scagnelli
- Father Smyth
- Father Tanguay
- Father Tedeschi
- Father Tousignant
- Father Turillo
- Father Ventre
We fight hard. And we win.
News & Case Alerts
Read related articles and learn about recently filed cases.
Working with Tad Roumayah
I can’t say enough good things about working with Tad Roumayah. From our very first conversation, he was attentive, straightforward, and genuinely invested in getting the best outcome for my case. He took the time to explain everything clearly, answered my questions (even the ones I asked more than once)…
Praise for Alexis Amy and Tad Roumayah
I am very happy with the settlement Sommers Schwartz obtained for me in my age and disability discrimination case.Tad Roumayah and Alexis Amy explained every step of the process and answered all my questions along the way.I highly recommend this law firm!
I Cannot Say Enough Good Things About This Law Firm and My Attorney, Matthew G. Curtis.
I cannot say enough good things about this law firm and my attorney, Matthew G. Curtis. From the very beginning, their professionalism, communication, and attention to detail stood out immediately. They kept me informed throughout the entire process, answered my questions promptly, and always made me feel like a priority…
From a Wayne State Medical School Student About Judy Susskind
Law & Medicine was truly one of my favorite rotations – seeing a trial and learning from you was a privilege. Medical students are so lucky to have such an incredible preceptor for this experience. Your firm, colleagues, and clients are lucky to have you. (From a Wayne State University…
Praise for Tad Roumayah and Nathan Robbins
Tad Roumayah and Nathan Robbins are very professional and knowledgeable. They took charge from beginning to end with my employment case. I highly recommend them.
A Recommendation for Matthew Curtis and David Black
I highly recommend Matthew Curtis and David Black. They represented me in a legal malpractice case and did an outstanding job. They were very responsive, organized, efficient, and easy to work with throughout the entire process. What I appreciated most was that they were willing to take my case when…
Thank You, Jason Thompson
I just wanted to say thank you, Jason. The amount of work that you have done is astronomical, and it hasn’t gone unnoticed. We’ve always felt that you do what you say, take responsibility for your actions, even when you’re wrong, and that your word is your bond. (We found…
Heartfelt Thanks to Judy Susskind
Judy, I wanted to inform you that my mother passed away last night after losing a painful battle. She wanted me to specifically contact you and thank you for what you did for her. You took a chance and stood by her when no one else would, and you helped…
Our Clients Say It Best






