Monsignor John C. Allard served the Diocese of Providence for nearly four decades, holding assignments across multiple Rhode Island parishes and youth ministry programs. He is now among the clergy members named in the Rhode Island Attorney General’s landmark 2026 report on child sexual abuse within the Diocese of Providence. If you or someone you love was abused by Monsignor Allard, or by any other member of the Diocese, you are not alone. What happened was not your fault. A sexual assault lawyer at Sommers Schwartz can help you understand your rights and explore every legal option available to you under Rhode Island law.

Table of Contents

• Who Was Monsignor John C. Allard?
• What the Rhode Island Attorney General’s Report Revealed About Allard
• How the Diocese of Providence Failed to Protect Children
• Rhode Island’s New Child Sexual Abuse Law Opens a Legal Window for Survivors
• What a Civil Claim Against the Diocese of Providence Can Look Like
• FAQs About Father Raymond Allard and Rhode Island Clergy Abuse Claims

Who Was Monsignor John C. Allard?

Monsignor John C. Allard was ordained a priest of the Diocese of Providence on September 19, 1975. His assignment history, along with known allegations of child sexual misconduct and the Diocese’s responses, are documented in the Rhode Island Attorney General’s report. Over his career, he held positions at parishes and youth programs across the state, giving him regular access to children and teenagers.

Allard served at St. Agatha and Precious Blood parishes and the Father Marot CYO Center. Before those assignments, he spent years at Immaculate Conception Church in Cranston, where the known abuse took place. He also served at the Providence South Catholic Youth Organization (CYO) Center and the Diocesan Office of Youth Ministry, roles that placed him in direct contact with young people throughout Rhode Island.

One survivor described being groomed before he was abused by Monsignor Allard, who served at Immaculate Conception Church in Cranston in 1981. The survivor said Allard gave him attention and physical affection between seventh and eighth grade. This kind of deliberate grooming, building trust and normalizing physical contact before crossing clear boundaries, is a recognized pattern in clergy sexual abuse cases.

Allard died on April 27, 2018. He was included on the Diocese’s list of credibly accused clergy on July 1, 2019, and is also named in the Rhode Island Attorney General’s report released on March 4, 2026. His death does not eliminate the possibility of civil claims against the institutions that employed and supervised him.

What the Rhode Island Attorney General’s Report Revealed About Allard

The Attorney General’s report accused the Catholic Diocese of Providence of a “well-worn pattern” of failing to remove dozens of priests accused of child sexual abuse and keeping the abuse secret over decades. Monsignor Allard’s case is one of the clearest examples of that pattern in action.

In 2013, a complainant reported to the Diocese that Allard began abusing him in 1981, when he was 15 years old, and continued for about two years. When confronted, Allard admitted to 20 to 25 instances of sexual abuse. The Diocese’s Review Board found the allegations credible, and Bishop Tobin placed Allard on administrative leave, prohibited him from saying Mass, barred him from appearing publicly in clerical attire, and required him to vacate St. Agatha’s rectory in Woonsocket.

While a review board deemed the victim’s abuse credible, then-Providence Bishop Thomas Tobin intervened, asking the Vatican’s powerful doctrine office to allow Allard to retire without being removed from the priesthood. The Vatican agreed. Bishop Tobin’s written recommendation to the Vatican described Allard as unlikely to be a danger to young people and noted it was the first and only known allegation against him, a framing that critics argue minimized the seriousness of his admitted conduct.

The Vatican ordered a “life of prayer and penance” for Allard, a sanction typically reserved for priests who are too old or infirm for full dismissal. Allard was only 64 years old at the time, and the Diocesan records contain no indication that he was infirm. The Vatican also instructed Bishop Tobin to monitor Allard and ensure he posed no danger to minors. There is no indication in the Diocesan records that any such monitoring ever took place.

What happened next is deeply troubling. Despite being directed to vacate St. Agatha’s rectory in Woonsocket, Allard returned to work there just over a year later as a part-time cook. The Diocese was apparently unaware of this arrangement for several months, until a routine audit flagged it in June 2015. Even then, the Diocese’s response was limited to instructing the parish to stop paying Allard, rather than taking any steps to ensure he had no contact with children.

How the Diocese of Providence Failed to Protect Children

The Attorney General’s report accused the Diocese of Providence of keeping abuse secret over decades. The report identified 75 clergy members who sexually abused more than 300 children since 1950. The investigation found that accused priests were repeatedly returned to ministry. Allard’s case fits this pattern precisely.

The Diocese publicly admitted, around the time of Allard’s forced retirement, that it had no program in place to monitor priests who had admitted to child sexual misconduct. This is not a minor administrative gap. It means that a man who admitted to abusing a child 20 to 25 times was allowed to move through the Diocese with virtually no oversight.

The Rhode Island Attorney General’s report, released on March 4, 2026, is a 284-page document that lays out decades of institutional failure. The push for Rhode Island’s new law was closely tied to this report, which documented more than 300 survivors of abuse within the Diocese of Providence and identified 75 clergy members with credible allegations of sexual misconduct dating back to 1950. It also outlined how the Diocese allegedly concealed that abuse for decades.

Survivors of Diocese of Providence clergy abuse often carry the weight of what happened to them for years, sometimes decades, before they feel ready to speak. The abuse was not their fault. The failure to stop it, to monitor known abusers, and to protect children rested entirely with the institution. Rhode Island law now gives survivors a path to hold that institution accountable, and a sexual abuse lawyer at Sommers Schwartz can walk you through that path in a confidential conversation.

Rhode Island’s New Child Sexual Abuse Law Opens a Legal Window for Survivors

On June 11, 2026, Rhode Island Governor Dan McKee signed legislation giving survivors of childhood sexual abuse a new opportunity to pursue civil claims that would otherwise be permanently closed. This law, known as H-7200A/S-2616A, is one of the most significant legal developments for abuse survivors in Rhode Island history.

The law amends the statute of limitations for claims of sexual abuse of a child and creates a two-year window for victims to bring otherwise time-barred claims against institutions and supervisors accused of enabling or covering up sexual abuse. The new law takes effect on July 1, 2026.

The new law establishes a two-year civil “revival window” that opens from July 1, 2026 to June 30, 2028. During this 24-month period, survivors can file civil suits even if the statute of limitations on their claims had previously expired. This is critically important for survivors of Monsignor Allard’s abuse, whose claims against the Diocese and its supervisors may have been barred under older law.

In 2019, the General Assembly extended the statute of limitations and gave previously time-barred survivors an opportunity to sue. But in 2023, the Rhode Island Supreme Court ruled that the 2019 law only applied to suits against individual perpetrators, not the institutions or supervisors who enabled them. The 2026 law directly addresses that gap. It allows survivors to pursue claims against the Diocese of Providence and other institutions that covered up or enabled abuse, not just against individual abusers.

Survivors now have 35 years from the date of the abuse, or 7 years from the time they first connected their injury to the abuse, whichever is later. The clock does not start running until a survivor turns 18. These provisions apply going forward. For survivors whose claims were already time-barred, the two-year revival window is the critical opportunity. All time-barred claims must be filed by June 30, 2028, or they may be forever barred.

What a Civil Claim Against the Diocese of Providence Can Look Like

A civil lawsuit is separate from a criminal case. You do not need a police report or a criminal conviction to pursue a civil claim. Civil cases use a lower standard of proof than criminal cases, and they allow survivors to seek compensation for the real harm they have suffered, including emotional trauma, therapy costs, and the long-term effects of abuse on their lives and relationships.

In a civil claim related to Monsignor Allard’s abuse, potential defendants could include the Diocese of Providence itself, as well as the supervisors and officials who knew about the risk he posed and failed to act. The Rhode Island Attorney General’s report makes clear that Diocesan officials were aware of Allard’s admitted abuse, were instructed by the Vatican to monitor him, and failed to do so. That documented institutional failure is exactly the kind of conduct that Rhode Island’s new law targets.

Claims against institutions require careful preparation. You need attorneys who understand how to build a case against a large organization with decades of records, internal communications, and a history of resisting accountability. The team at Sommers Schwartz has represented survivors of sexual assault attorney cases across multiple states and knows how to pursue these claims with both legal precision and genuine compassion for survivors.

Every survivor’s situation is different. Some people remember the details clearly. Others have spent years trying to process what happened. Some have never told anyone before. All of that is understandable. You do not need to have a complete picture of everything that happened to start a conversation with an attorney. That conversation is confidential, and it costs you nothing to reach out.

FAQs About Father Raymond Allard and Rhode Island Clergy Abuse Claims

Can I still file a claim if Monsignor Allard is deceased?

Yes. The death of an individual abuser does not necessarily end your legal options. Rhode Island’s new law, H-7200A/S-2616A, allows survivors to file civil claims against institutions and supervisors who enabled or covered up abuse. The Diocese of Providence, as the institution that employed, supervised, and failed to monitor Allard, can still be named as a defendant in a civil lawsuit. The two-year revival window runs from July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2028, so acting promptly is important.

What does the two-year revival window actually mean for me?

The revival window is a limited period of time during which Rhode Island law temporarily lifts the statute of limitations for previously time-barred claims. If your civil claim against the Diocese of Providence or another institution was blocked because too much time had passed, the window reopens that opportunity. It applies to claims against institutions and supervisors accused of enabling or covering up child sexual abuse. This window is only open until June 30, 2028, after which time-barred claims may be permanently closed.

Do I need to have reported the abuse to police to file a civil lawsuit?

No. A civil lawsuit is entirely separate from a criminal case. You are not required to have filed a police report, and no criminal charges need to be pending or resolved for you to pursue a civil claim. Many survivors of clergy abuse never reported to law enforcement, often because they were young, afraid, or did not believe they would be believed. None of that prevents you from exploring a civil claim today. An attorney at Sommers Schwartz can review your situation confidentially and explain what options may be available to you.

What if I am not sure whether what happened to me counts as sexual abuse?

You do not need to make that determination on your own. Rhode Island law defines sexual abuse of a child broadly, and conduct that may not seem like “obvious” abuse to a survivor, especially one who was groomed over time, can still form the basis of a valid legal claim. Grooming behaviors, unwanted touching, and sexual contact of any kind between an adult in a position of authority and a minor are taken seriously under the law. Reach out to an attorney who handles these cases. They will listen without judgment and help you understand whether your experience may qualify.

How do I know if Sommers Schwartz is the right firm for my case?

Sommers Schwartz is a multi-state law firm with attorneys who represent survivors of sexual assault and sexual abuse in Rhode Island and beyond. The firm handles clergy abuse claims, including cases involving the Diocese of Providence, with a focus on both legal accountability and survivor well-being. Your initial consultation is confidential, and you pay nothing unless the firm recovers compensation for you. If you were harmed by a member of the Diocese of Providence, or by an institution that failed to protect you, you deserve to speak with someone who will take your experience seriously from the very first conversation.

More Resources About Clergy Abuse

• Diocese of Providence Clergy Abuse
• Father John Abruzzese
• Father Argencourt
• Father Azzarone
• Father Barnes
• Father Battel
• Father Belhumeur
• Father Bordignon
• Father Dennis Brodeur
• Father Campbell
• Father Carpentier
• Father Cavanaugh
• Father Charland
• Father Corbesero
• Father Crafton
• Father D’Angelo
• Father DeAngelis
• Father Louis Demers
• Father Albert Desrosiers
• Father Paul Desrosiers
• Father Diogo
• Father Dolan
• Father Doran
• Father Dunn
• Father Dziob
• Father Edes
• Father Feeney
• Father Oscar Ferland
• Father Ferry
• Father Fitzgerald
• Father Flanagan
• Father Gagnon
• Father Gillooly
• Father Gorton
• Father Guertin
• Father Holden
• Father James Jackson
• Father Edward Kelley
• Father Lacasse
• Father LaMountain
• Father Leboeuf
• Father Paul Henry Leech
• Father Lepire
• Father Lonardo
• Father Philip Magaldi
• Father Manu
• Father Normand Marcantonio
• Father Joseph McCra
• Father McIntyre
• Father Meehan
• Father Meglio
• Father Menard
• Father Micarelli
• Father O’Connell
• Father J.F. O’Neil
• Father W. O’Neill
• Father Powers
• Father Rafferty
• Father Raiche
• Father Reynolds
• Father Rocha
• Father Sadowski
• Father Santagata
• Father Francis Santilli
• Father John Scagnelli
• Father Smyth
• Father Tanguay
• Father Tedeschi
• Father Tormey
• Father Tousignant
• Father Turillo
• Father Ventre