Father Joseph Rocha was a Dominican Friar who spent years in positions of authority over children in Rhode Island, and the Rhode Island Attorney General’s 2026 report formally identified him as a credibly accused abuser. If you or someone you love was harmed by Father Rocha, you are not alone, and what happened was not your fault. Rhode Island’s new child sexual abuse law has opened a path to justice that did not exist before, and the attorneys at Sommers Schwartz are ready to help you understand your options.
Table of Contents
- Who Was Father Joseph Rocha and What Did He Do in Rhode Island?
- How the Diocese of Providence Enabled Father Rocha’s Access to Children
- Rhode Island’s New Child Sexual Abuse Law (H-7200A/S-2616A) and What It Means for Father Rocha Survivors
- The Attorney General’s Report and Father Rocha’s Place on the Credibly Accused List
- Your Rights as a Survivor and How Sommers Schwartz Can Help
- FAQs About Father Joseph Rocha and Rhode Island Clergy Abuse Claims
Who Was Father Joseph Rocha and What Did He Do in Rhode Island?
Father Joseph Rocha was a Dominican Friar who served at Bishop Hendricken High School in Warwick from 1977 to 1982, also holding a role as Judge on the Diocesan Marriage Tribunal from 1980 to 1983. His access to young people through a prominent Catholic high school gave him sustained contact with minors over several years.
According to the Rhode Island Attorney General’s report on child sexual abuse in the Diocese of Providence, Father Rocha reportedly abused a boy three times during the summer of 1982. The report describes how he used off-campus trips to gain private, unsupervised access to his victim. The first incident occurred on a camping trip to New Hampshire, where Rocha and the boy shared a bed. A second incident took place at a summer home on Cape Cod. Additional abuse reportedly followed.
A now 59-year-old man filed a lawsuit claiming he was sexually abused by Father Joseph Rocha when he was 15, for his entire freshman year at Bishop Hendricken High School. That lawsuit was filed under Rhode Island’s new child sexual abuse law, which took effect on July 1, 2026.
Rocha left the Diocese of Providence in 1986 and left the Dominican Order in 1988. His departure did not end his pattern of harmful conduct. In 2001, he pleaded guilty to the sexual assault in 1999 of a 21-year-old mentally disabled man, for whom he had been working as a personal care attendant. He was ordered to register as a sex offender and died in 2009.
Rocha’s time at Bishop Hendricken High School is not listed on his assignment history provided by the diocese, which is where one of the sexual abuse allegations happened. That omission reflects a broader pattern documented throughout the Attorney General’s report: the Diocese of Providence routinely failed to create or preserve accurate records of where accused priests had served.
How the Diocese of Providence Enabled Father Rocha’s Access to Children
Father Rocha’s abuse did not happen in a vacuum. The Rhode Island Attorney General’s report concluded that the Diocese of Providence had a systemic pattern of placing accused clergy in positions where they retained access to children and vulnerable people, often with little to no meaningful oversight.
The Attorney General’s report specifically identified overnight trips, cottages, and vacation homes as settings where clergy used seclusion to commit abuse. These locations provided uninterrupted access to children and reinforced victims’ sense of isolation. Father Rocha’s use of a camping trip to New Hampshire and a summer home on Cape Cod fits this documented pattern precisely.
The lawsuit filed against the Diocese and Bishop Hendricken High School states that they “failed to meaningfully address the systematic child sexual abuse by clergy members.” Survivors who have come forward describe carrying the consequences of that institutional failure for the rest of their lives.
The Attorney General’s report accused the Catholic Diocese of Providence of a “well-worn pattern” of failing to remove dozens of priests accused of child sexual abuse and keeping the abuse secret over decades. Father Rocha’s case illustrates that pattern directly. He remained in ministry at Bishop Hendricken for years, held a judicial role within the Diocese, and left only after reportedly seeking, unsuccessfully, to become a permanent Diocesan priest.
Survivors who experienced abuse by Father Rocha, or by other clergy connected to Bishop Hendricken High School or the Diocese of Providence, may have civil claims not only against the individual abuser but against the institutions that gave him authority and failed to stop him. A knowledgeable sexual abuse lawyer can help you understand what claims may apply to your situation.
Rhode Island’s New Child Sexual Abuse Law (H-7200A/S-2616A) and What It Means for Father Rocha Survivors
Rhode Island’s new law amends the statute of limitations for claims of sexual abuse of a child and creates a two-year window for victims to bring otherwise time-barred claims against institutions and supervisors accused of enabling or covering up sexual abuse. The new law took effect on July 1, 2026.
This matters enormously for survivors of Father Rocha. Most of the reported abuse occurred in 1981 and 1982, meaning that under prior law, many survivors had no legal path forward against the Diocese or Bishop Hendricken High School. In 2023, the Rhode Island Supreme Court ruled that a prior 2019 law only applied to suits against individual perpetrators, not the institutions or supervisors who enabled them. The new law, H-7200A/S-2616A, directly addresses that gap.
The new law establishes a two-year civil revival window that opens from July 1, 2026 to June 30, 2028. During this 24-month period, survivors can file civil suits even if the statute of limitations on their claims had previously expired.
For future claims, survivors must file by whichever date is later: either 35 years from the date of the abusive act, or seven years from when the survivor first discovers or reasonably connects their adult injuries to the childhood abuse. The new law specifically targets institutions and organizations such as churches, schools, youth programs, healthcare facilities and sports leagues, as well as supervisors.
If you were abused by Father Rocha and believed your window had closed, that may no longer be true. Speaking with a sexual assault lawyer who understands this law is the most important first step you can take right now.
The Attorney General’s Report and Father Rocha’s Place on the Credibly Accused List
The push for Rhode Island’s new law was closely tied to a 284-page report released in March 2026 by Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha. The report documented more than 300 survivors of abuse within the Diocese of Providence and identified 75 clergy members with credible allegations of sexual misconduct dating back to 1950. It also outlined how the Diocese allegedly concealed that abuse for decades.
Father Rocha was included in the Rhode Island Attorney General’s March 2026 report. He also appears on the Diocese of Providence’s own List of Credibly Accused Clergy, as well as on the Dominican Province of St. Joseph’s list of friars with established allegations. His inclusion across multiple independent lists reflects the strength and consistency of the allegations against him.
The Attorney General’s report did not treat Father Rocha’s case in isolation. It documented a Diocese-wide pattern in which accused clergy were reassigned, protected, and shielded from accountability. The report found that the Diocese’s historical response to clergy abuse complaints amounted to inaction, concealment, and revictimization. For survivors of Father Rocha, this institutional failure is itself a legal issue, not just a moral one.
The report identified approximately 75 clergy members with credible allegations involving more than 300 minor children and described patterns in which accused clergy were reassigned and allegations were inconsistently reported to authorities. Father Rocha’s career trajectory, including his roles at St. Pius V Church in Providence, Bishop Hendricken High School, and the Diocesan Marriage Tribunal, reflects exactly that kind of institutional enabling.
Your Rights as a Survivor and How Sommers Schwartz Can Help
Survivors of childhood sexual abuse often wait years, or even decades, before they feel ready to talk about what happened. That is completely understandable. Trauma reshapes how we process memory and how safe we feel speaking out. Nothing about the timing of your decision to come forward changes the fact that what was done to you was wrong, and that you deserve to be heard.
Rhode Island law now gives survivors a real opportunity to hold institutions accountable. Within hours of the new law taking effect on July 1, 2026, more than two dozen lawsuits were filed against the Roman Catholic Church in Rhode Island, with at least 30 claims filed in Rhode Island Superior Court by individuals alleging they were abused as children and teens. The response was immediate because survivors had been waiting for this moment.
If you were abused by Father Rocha, or by any other member of the clergy associated with the Diocese of Providence, you may have a civil claim against both the individual abuser and the institutions that failed to protect you. Civil claims can result in compensation for the harm you have suffered, including the pain, anxiety, depression, and lasting trauma that survivors describe carrying for their entire lives.
Sommers Schwartz represents survivors of sexual abuse and assault across Rhode Island and multiple states. Our attorneys understand the courage it takes to come forward, and we treat every client with the respect and care they deserve. Whether your abuse occurred at Bishop Hendricken High School, at a parish, on a church-sponsored trip, or in any other setting connected to the Diocese of Providence, we want to hear your story. Contacting a sexual assault attorney at Sommers Schwartz costs nothing upfront, and we can help you understand whether the new revival window applies to your situation before time runs out on June 30, 2028.
FAQs About Father Joseph Rocha and Rhode Island Clergy Abuse Claims
Was Father Joseph Rocha ever convicted of a crime?
Yes. In 2001, Father Rocha pleaded guilty to the sexual assault in 1999 of a 21-year-old mentally disabled man, for whom he had been working as a personal care attendant. He was ordered to register as a sex offender. His criminal conviction is separate from the civil allegations related to his time at Bishop Hendricken High School, which are the subject of ongoing civil litigation under Rhode Island’s new child sexual abuse law.
Can I still file a civil lawsuit against the Diocese of Providence for Father Rocha’s abuse if it happened decades ago?
Yes, under the new law, a two-year civil revival window opened on July 1, 2026 and runs through June 30, 2028. During this 24-month period, survivors can file civil suits even if the statute of limitations on their claims had previously expired. This window specifically allows claims against institutions and supervisors accused of enabling or covering up abuse, meaning you may be able to sue the Diocese and Bishop Hendricken High School, not just Father Rocha himself. Because Rocha died in 2009, speaking with an attorney quickly about your options is important.
Does it matter that Father Rocha is deceased?
Father Rocha’s death does not automatically eliminate your civil options. Rhode Island’s new law focuses heavily on institutional liability, meaning claims can be brought against the Diocese of Providence, Bishop Hendricken High School, and other supervisory entities that knew about, enabled, or failed to stop the abuse. An attorney can evaluate the specific facts of your situation and advise you on which claims are available against which parties.
What does it mean that Father Rocha is on the “Credibly Accused” list?
The term “credibly accused” means there is a reasonable basis to believe that the alleged conduct more likely than not occurred, as determined by the Attorney General. Father Rocha appears on the Rhode Island Attorney General’s credibly accused list, the Diocese of Providence’s own list, and the Dominican Province of St. Joseph’s list. His inclusion on multiple independent lists reflects that the allegations against him were evaluated and found credible by more than one reviewing authority. This designation can be meaningful context in a civil case, though it is not a criminal conviction.
What should I do if I was abused by Father Rocha or another priest at Bishop Hendricken High School?
The most important thing you can do right now is speak with an attorney who handles Rhode Island clergy abuse cases. The revival window created by H-7200A/S-2616A closes on June 30, 2028, and once it closes, time-barred claims may be permanently lost. You do not need to have all the details figured out before you call. You do not need documentation or physical evidence to start a conversation. What happened to you matters, and you deserve to have someone in your corner who will listen without judgment and fight for you. Reach out to Sommers Schwartz today to take that first step.
More Resources About Clergy Abuse
- Diocese of Providence Clergy Abuse
- Father John Abruzzese
- Father Raymond Allard
- Father Argencourt
- Father Azzarone
- Father Barnes
- Father Battel
- Father Belhumeur
- Father Bordignon
- Father Dennis Brodeur
- Father Campbell
- Father Carpentier
- Father Cavanaugh
- Father Charland
- Father Corbesero
- Father Crafton
- Father D’Angelo
- Father DeAngelis
- Father Louis Demers
- Father Albert Desrosiers
- Father Paul Desrosiers
- Father Diogo
- Father Dolan
- Father Doran
- Father Dunn
- Father Dziob
- Father Edes
- Father Feeney
- Father Oscar Ferland
- Father Ferry
- Father Fitzgerald
- Father Flanagan
- Father Gagnon
- Father Gillooly
- Father Gorton
- Father Guertin
- Father Holden
- Father James Jackson
- Father Edward Kelley
- Father Lacasse
- Father LaMountain
- Father Leboeuf
- Father Paul Henry Leech
- Father Lepire
- Father Lonardo
- Father Philip Magaldi
- Father Manu
- Father Normand Marcantonio
- Father Joseph McCra
- Father McIntyre
- Father Meehan
- Father Meglio
- Father Menard
- Father Micarelli
- Father O’Connell
- Father J.F. O’Neil
- Father W. O’Neill
- Father Powers
- Father Rafferty
- Father Raiche
- Father Reynolds
- Father Sadowski
- Father Santagata
- Father Francis Santilli
- Father John Scagnelli
- Father Smyth
- Father Tanguay
- Father Tedeschi
- Father Tormey
- Father Tousignant
- Father Turillo
- Father Ventre
We fight hard. And we win.
News & Case Alerts
Read related articles and learn about recently filed cases.
Working with Tad Roumayah
I can’t say enough good things about working with Tad Roumayah. From our very first conversation, he was attentive, straightforward, and genuinely invested in getting the best outcome for my case. He took the time to explain everything clearly, answered my questions (even the ones I asked more than once)…
Praise for Alexis Amy and Tad Roumayah
I am very happy with the settlement Sommers Schwartz obtained for me in my age and disability discrimination case.Tad Roumayah and Alexis Amy explained every step of the process and answered all my questions along the way.I highly recommend this law firm!
I Cannot Say Enough Good Things About This Law Firm and My Attorney, Matthew G. Curtis.
I cannot say enough good things about this law firm and my attorney, Matthew G. Curtis. From the very beginning, their professionalism, communication, and attention to detail stood out immediately. They kept me informed throughout the entire process, answered my questions promptly, and always made me feel like a priority…
From a Wayne State Medical School Student About Judy Susskind
Law & Medicine was truly one of my favorite rotations – seeing a trial and learning from you was a privilege. Medical students are so lucky to have such an incredible preceptor for this experience. Your firm, colleagues, and clients are lucky to have you. (From a Wayne State University…
Praise for Tad Roumayah and Nathan Robbins
Tad Roumayah and Nathan Robbins are very professional and knowledgeable. They took charge from beginning to end with my employment case. I highly recommend them.
A Recommendation for Matthew Curtis and David Black
I highly recommend Matthew Curtis and David Black. They represented me in a legal malpractice case and did an outstanding job. They were very responsive, organized, efficient, and easy to work with throughout the entire process. What I appreciated most was that they were willing to take my case when…
Thank You, Jason Thompson
I just wanted to say thank you, Jason. The amount of work that you have done is astronomical, and it hasn’t gone unnoticed. We’ve always felt that you do what you say, take responsibility for your actions, even when you’re wrong, and that your word is your bond. (We found…
Heartfelt Thanks to Judy Susskind
Judy, I wanted to inform you that my mother passed away last night after losing a painful battle. She wanted me to specifically contact you and thank you for what you did for her. You took a chance and stood by her when no one else would, and you helped…
Our Clients Say It Best





